Abstract:Deep neural networks (DNNs) have been shown lack of robustness, as they are vulnerable to small perturbations on the inputs. This has led to safety concerns on applying DNNs to safety-critical domains. Several verification approaches based on constraint solving have been developed to automatically prove or disprove safety properties for DNNs. However, these approaches suffer from the scalability problem, i.e., only small DNNs can be handled. To deal with this, abstraction based approaches have been proposed, but are unfortunately facing the precision problem, i.e., the obtained bounds are often loose. In this paper, we focus on a variety of local robustness properties and a (δ,ε) -global robustness property of DNNs, and investigate novel strategies to combine the constraint solving and abstraction-based approaches to work with these properties: We propose a method to verify local robustness, which improves a recent proposal of analyzing DNNs through the classic abstract interpretation technique, by a novel symbolic propagation technique. Specifically, the values of neurons are represented symbolically and propagated from the input layer to the output layer, on top of the underlying abstract domains. It achieves significantly higher precision and thus can prove more properties. We propose a Lipschitz constant based verification framework. By utilising Lipschitz constants solved by semidefinite programming, we can prove global robustness of DNNs. We show how the Lipschitz constant can be tightened if it is restricted to small regions. A tightened Lipschitz constantcan be helpful in proving local robustness properties. Furthermore, a global Lipschitz constant can be used to accelerate batch local robustness verification, and thus support the verification of global robustness. We show how the proposed abstract interpretation and Lipschitz constant based approaches can benefit from each other to obtain more precise results. Moreover, they can be also exploited and combined to improve constraints based approach. We implement our methods in the tool PRODeep, and conduct detailed experimental results on several benchmarks

Verifying Global Two-Safety Properties in Neural Networks with Confidence

Enhancing Robustness Verification for Deep Neural Networks Via Symbolic Propagation

Safety Analysis of Deep Neural Networks

A Dual Approach to Scalable Verification of Deep Networks

Certifying Global Robustness for Deep Neural Networks

Global Robustness Verification Networks

Enumerating Safe Regions in Deep Neural Networks with Provable Probabilistic Guarantees

Verifying Safety of Neural Networks from Topological Perspectives

Quantitative Verification of Neural Networks And its Security Applications

DeepSafe: A Data-driven Approach for Checking Adversarial Robustness in Neural Networks

Neural Network Verification with Proof Production

Unifying Qualitative and Quantitative Safety Verification of DNN-Controlled Systems

Verification of Neural Networks' Global Robustness

Verifying Global Neural Network Specifications using Hyperproperties

DeepGlobal: A Framework for Global Robustness Verification of Feedforward Neural Networks

Analyzing Deep Neural Networks with Symbolic Propagation: Towards Higher Precision and Faster Verification

Neuro-Symbolic Verification of Deep Neural Networks

Safety Verification and Robustness Analysis of Neural Networks via Quadratic Constraints and Semidefinite Programming

DeepGlobal - A Global Robustness Verifiable FNN Framework.

Toward Scalable Verification for Safety-Critical Deep Networks

Assumption Generation for the Verification of Learning-Enabled Autonomous Systems