Abstract:Deep neural networks (DNNs) have been shown lack of robustness, as they are vulnerable to small perturbations on the inputs. This has led to safety concerns on applying DNNs to safety-critical domains. Several verification approaches based on constraint solving have been developed to automatically prove or disprove safety properties for DNNs. However, these approaches suffer from the scalability problem, i.e., only small DNNs can be handled. To deal with this, abstraction based approaches have been proposed, but are unfortunately facing the precision problem, i.e., the obtained bounds are often loose. In this paper, we focus on a variety of local robustness properties and a (δ,ε) -global robustness property of DNNs, and investigate novel strategies to combine the constraint solving and abstraction-based approaches to work with these properties: We propose a method to verify local robustness, which improves a recent proposal of analyzing DNNs through the classic abstract interpretation technique, by a novel symbolic propagation technique. Specifically, the values of neurons are represented symbolically and propagated from the input layer to the output layer, on top of the underlying abstract domains. It achieves significantly higher precision and thus can prove more properties. We propose a Lipschitz constant based verification framework. By utilising Lipschitz constants solved by semidefinite programming, we can prove global robustness of DNNs. We show how the Lipschitz constant can be tightened if it is restricted to small regions. A tightened Lipschitz constantcan be helpful in proving local robustness properties. Furthermore, a global Lipschitz constant can be used to accelerate batch local robustness verification, and thus support the verification of global robustness. We show how the proposed abstract interpretation and Lipschitz constant based approaches can benefit from each other to obtain more precise results. Moreover, they can be also exploited and combined to improve constraints based approach. We implement our methods in the tool PRODeep, and conduct detailed experimental results on several benchmarks

Neuro-Symbolic Verification of Deep Neural Networks

Improving Neural Network Verification through Spurious Region Guided Refinement.

Enhancing Robustness Verification for Deep Neural Networks Via Symbolic Propagation

Efficient Symbolic Reasoning for Neural-Network Verification

Analyzing Deep Neural Networks with Symbolic Propagation: Towards Higher Precision and Faster Verification

Quantitative Verification of Neural Networks And its Security Applications

A Dual Approach to Scalable Verification of Deep Networks

Vehicle: Bridging the Embedding Gap in the Verification of Neuro-Symbolic Programs

Introduction to Neural Network Verification

Verifying Global Neural Network Specifications using Hyperproperties

Automated Verification of Neural Networks: Advances, Challenges and Perspectives

Set-Based Training for Neural Network Verification

Verification and Design of Robust and Safe Neural Network-enabled Autonomous Systems

Towards Safety Verification of Direct Perception Neural Networks

Efficient Robustness Verification of the Deep Neural Networks for Smart IoT Devices

Formal Security Analysis of Neural Networks using Symbolic Intervals

Efficient Complete Verification of Neural Networks Via Layerwised Splitting and Refinement

Neuron Importance Based Verification of Neural Networks Via Divide and Conquer

Online Verification of Deep Neural Networks under Domain Shift or Network Updates

Adversarial Robustness of Deep Neural Networks: A Survey from a Formal Verification Perspective

CLEVEREST: Accelerating CEGAR-based Neural Network Verification via Adversarial Attacks