Abstract:Deep neural networks (DNNs) have been shown lack of robustness, as they are vulnerable to small perturbations on the inputs. This has led to safety concerns on applying DNNs to safety-critical domains. Several verification approaches based on constraint solving have been developed to automatically prove or disprove safety properties for DNNs. However, these approaches suffer from the scalability problem, i.e., only small DNNs can be handled. To deal with this, abstraction based approaches have been proposed, but are unfortunately facing the precision problem, i.e., the obtained bounds are often loose. In this paper, we focus on a variety of local robustness properties and a (δ,ε) -global robustness property of DNNs, and investigate novel strategies to combine the constraint solving and abstraction-based approaches to work with these properties: We propose a method to verify local robustness, which improves a recent proposal of analyzing DNNs through the classic abstract interpretation technique, by a novel symbolic propagation technique. Specifically, the values of neurons are represented symbolically and propagated from the input layer to the output layer, on top of the underlying abstract domains. It achieves significantly higher precision and thus can prove more properties. We propose a Lipschitz constant based verification framework. By utilising Lipschitz constants solved by semidefinite programming, we can prove global robustness of DNNs. We show how the Lipschitz constant can be tightened if it is restricted to small regions. A tightened Lipschitz constantcan be helpful in proving local robustness properties. Furthermore, a global Lipschitz constant can be used to accelerate batch local robustness verification, and thus support the verification of global robustness. We show how the proposed abstract interpretation and Lipschitz constant based approaches can benefit from each other to obtain more precise results. Moreover, they can be also exploited and combined to improve constraints based approach. We implement our methods in the tool PRODeep, and conduct detailed experimental results on several benchmarks

DeepGlobal: A Framework for Global Robustness Verification of Feedforward Neural Networks

DeepGlobal - A Global Robustness Verifiable FNN Framework.

Global Robustness Verification Networks

Using Z3 for Formal Modeling and Verification of FNN Global Robustness

Attack As Defense: Characterizing Adversarial Examples Using Robustness.

Certifying Global Robustness for Deep Neural Networks

DeepSafe: A Data-driven Approach for Checking Adversarial Robustness in Neural Networks

Model-Agnostic Reachability Analysis on Deep Neural Networks

Globally-Robust Neural Networks

Global Adversarial Attacks for Assessing Deep Learning Robustness

Complete Defense Framework to Protect Deep Neural Networks Against Adversarial Examples

Adversarial Robustness of Deep Neural Networks: A Survey from a Formal Verification Perspective

Enhancing Robustness Verification for Deep Neural Networks Via Symbolic Propagation

Efficient Robustness Verification of the Deep Neural Networks for Smart IoT Devices

A Universal Defense Strategy Against Adversarial Attacks Based on Attention-Guided

Attack-Guided Efficient Robustness Verification of ReLU Neural Networks

SoK: Certified Robustness for Deep Neural Networks

CLEVEREST: Accelerating CEGAR-based Neural Network Verification via Adversarial Attacks

DeepDyve: Dynamic Verification for Deep Neural Networks

RobustFair: Adversarial Evaluation through Fairness Confusion Directed Gradient Search

Towards Robust Training of Neural Networks by Regularizing Adversarial Gradients