Abstract:<h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Background and purpose</h3><p>To propose a novel machine learning-based method for reliable and accurate modeling of linac beam data applicable to the processes of linac commissioning and QA.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Materials and methods</h3><p>We hypothesize that the beam data is a function of inherent linac features and percentage depth doses (PDDs) and profiles of different field sizes are correlated with each other. The correlation is formulated as a multivariable regression problem using a machine learning framework. Varian TrueBeam beam data sets (n=43) acquired from multiple institutions were used to evaluate the framework. The data sets included PDDs and profiles across different energies and field sizes. A multivariate regression model was trained for prediction of beam specific PDDs and profiles of different field sizes using a 10x10cm<sup>2</sup> field as input.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Results</h3><p>Predictions of PDDs were achieved with a mean absolute percent relative error (%RE) of 0.19–0.35% across the different beam energies investigated. The maximum mean absolute %RE was 0.93%. For profile prediction, the mean absolute %RE was 0.66-0.93% with a maximum absolute %RE of 3.76%. The largest uncertainties in the PDD and profile predictions were found at the build-up region and at the field penumbra, respectively. The prediction accuracy increased with the number of training sets up to around 20 training sets.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Conclusions</h3><p>Through this novel machine learning-based method we have shown accurate and reproducible generation of beam data for linac commissioning for routine radiation therapy. This method has the potential to simplify the linac commissioning procedure, save time and manpower while increasing the accuracy of the commissioning process.</p>

Accelerator beam phase space tomography using machine learning to account for variations in beamline components

Accelerator beam phase space tomography using machine learning to account for variations in beamline components

Four-Dimensional Phase-Space Reconstruction of Flat and Magnetized Beams Using Neural Networks and Differentiable Simulations

Efficient 6-dimensional phase space reconstruction from experimental measurements using generative machine learning

In situ beam trajectory tilt measurement based on single cavity beam position monitor

Adaptive Machine Learning for Time-Varying Systems: Towards 6D Phase Space Diagnostics of Short Intense Charged Particle Beams

5D tomographic phase-space reconstruction of particle bunches

Predicting Beam Transmission Using 2-Dimensional Phase Space Projections of Hadron Accelerators

Four-dimensional Phase Space Measurement Using Multiple Two-Dimensional Profiles

Optimizing Dynamic Aperture Studies with Active Learning

Beam data modeling of linear accelerators (linacs) through machine learning and its potential applications in fast and robust linac commissioning and quality assurance

Accurate and confident prediction of electron beam longitudinal properties using spectral virtual diagnostics

Electron beam transverse phase space tomography using nanofabricated wire scanners with submicrometer resolution

Knife-edge based measurement of the 4D transverse phase space of electron beams with picometer-scale emittance

A conditional latent autoregressive recurrent model for generation and forecasting of beam dynamics in particle accelerators

Feature-Based Analysis of Plasma-Based Particle Acceleration Data

Determination of Longitudinal Phase Space in SLAC Main Accelerator Beams

Applying Fully Convolutional Networks for Beam Profile and Emittance Measurements

Using Magnetic Moment for Field Reconstruction in Accelerator Magnets and Particle Tracking

Beam 2-D Phase-Space Measurement with Ct and Cerenkov Radiation "double Imaging Method"