Abstract:Postulating the identification of $\psi^*(x, t) \psi(x,t)$ with a physical probability density is unsatisfactory conceptually and overly limited practically. For electrons, there is a simple, calculable relativistic correction proportional to $\nabla \psi^* \cdot \nabla \psi$. In particular, zeroes of the wave function do not indicate vanishing probability density of presence. Effects of this kind arise generically in Lagrangian-based theories implementing the particle concept.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper attempts to address the fundamental issue of defining probability density in quantum mechanics. Specifically, the author critiques the traditional assumption that the modulus squared of the wave function \( \psi^*(x, t) \psi(x, t) \) represents the probability density of a particle appearing at a certain position. The paper points out that this assumption is conceptually unsatisfactory and overly limited in practical applications.
### Main Issues
1. **Conceptual Deficiencies**:
- The traditional assumption that \( \psi^*(x, t) \psi(x, t) \) represents the probability density is flawed. Particularly in relativistic cases, this assumption fails to fully describe the behavior of electrons.
- Relativistic (Dirac) theory suggests that the probability density should include a correction term in the form of \( \frac{1}{4m^2} \nabla \psi^* \cdot \nabla \psi \). This correction term does not lead to zero probability density where the wave function is zero, thus avoiding some physically unreasonable phenomena.
2. **Practical Limitations**:
- In practical applications of non-relativistic quantum mechanics, the correction term is usually small, but it can become significant in certain specific situations (such as at the edges of high potential barriers or in highly excited states).
- These correction terms are crucial for understanding the behavior of particles under these special conditions.
### Solutions
1. **Corrected Probability Density**:
- The author proposes a new expression for the probability density in the form of \( \rho = \psi^* \psi + \frac{1}{4m^2} \nabla \psi^* \cdot \nabla \psi \). This expression is conceptually more reasonable and can provide a more accurate physical description under certain conditions.
2. **Corrected Schrödinger Equation**:
- To achieve this new probability density expression, the author derives a corrected Schrödinger equation. This equation includes an additional term in the form of \( a \nabla \psi^* \leftrightarrow \partial_t \nabla \psi \), where \( a \) is a constant.
- This corrected Schrödinger equation allows for a more accurate description of particle dynamics, especially in high-energy states and high potential barriers.
3. **Conservation Laws**:
- The author also discusses the conservation laws related to the new probability density, including charge conservation, energy conservation, and momentum conservation. The forms of these conservation laws change with the introduction of the correction term but remain physically reasonable.
### Case Analysis
- **Harmonic Oscillator**: Using the corrected Schrödinger equation, the author recalculates the energy eigenvalues and probability density of the harmonic oscillator. The results show that the energy eigenvalues are no longer evenly spaced, and the correction effects become more significant as the quantum number \( n \) increases.
- **Infinite Potential Well**: Similarly, the author analyzes the behavior of particles in an infinite potential well, deriving the corrected energy eigenvalues and probability density. The results indicate that the correction term has a notable impact on the probability density in high-energy states.
### Conclusion
By introducing the corrected probability density and the corresponding corrected Schrödinger equation, the paper provides a more reasonable and accurate framework for quantum mechanics. These corrections are not only conceptually more complete but also better describe the behavior of particles under certain specific conditions in practical applications.