E. Forgacs-Dajka,K. Petrovay
Abstract:Helioseismic measurements indicate that the solar tachocline is very thin, its full thickness not exceeding 4% of the solar radius. The mechanism that inhibits differential rotation to propagate from the convective zone to deeper into the radiative zone is not known, though several propositions have been made. In this paper we demonstrate by numerical models and analytic estimates that the tachocline can be confined to its observed thickness by a poloidal magnetic field B_p of about one kilogauss, penetrating below the convective zone and oscillating with a period of 22 years, if the tachocline region is turbulent with a diffusivity of eta 10^10 cm^2/s (for a turbulent magnetic Prandtl number of unity). We also show that a similar confinement may be produced for other pairs of the parameter values (B_p, eta). The assumption of the dynamo field penetrating into the tachocline is consistent whenever eta>10^9 cm^2/s.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The core problem that this paper attempts to solve is to explore whether quantum probability can be understood as Bayesian probability. Specifically, the authors hope to prove that quantum probability can be interpreted as a measure of subjective belief, and this interpretation is valid in a single trial without relying on the limiting behavior of frequencies. To achieve this goal, the paper mainly addresses the following aspects:
1. **Distinguishing the Essence of Classical and Quantum Probabilities**:
- In the classical world, the maximum information about a physical system is complete and can provide definite answers to all possible questions.
- In the quantum world, the maximum information is incomplete and cannot provide definite answers to all questions.
2. **Application of Subjective Probability**:
- The authors show how to apply Bayesian probability to quantum mechanics, especially when scientists have maximum information and must assign a unique pure state.
- Through Gleason's theorem, they prove that any subjective quantum probability assignment must conform to the standard quantum probability rules:
\[
p(\hat{\Pi})=\text{tr}(\hat{\rho}\hat{\Pi}) = \langle\psi|\hat{\rho}|\psi\rangle
\]
where \(\hat{\rho}\) is the density operator and \(\hat{\Pi}\) is the projection operator.
3. **Relationship between Probability and Frequency**:
- The paper further explores the close connection between subjective probability and measurement frequency when having maximum information, which is more stringent than in the classical case.
- Using the Dutch - book argument and Hilbert space structure, the authors prove that there is a strict correspondence between probability and frequency in quantum mechanics.
4. **Treatment of Unknown Quantum States**:
- The authors propose a method to eliminate the concept of "unknown quantum state", that is, to describe the states of multiple quantum systems through the quantum de Finetti representation theorem. This theorem shows that a sequence of exchange - symmetric density operators can be represented by a mixed state of an unknown density operator:
\[
\hat{\rho}(N)=\int d\rho\,p(\rho)\rho^{\otimes N}
\]
5. **Quantum - State Tomography**:
- The authors discuss the process of quantum - state tomography, in which experimenters can update their state assignments through multiple measurements and finally reach a consistent pure - state assignment.
Overall, the main purpose of this paper is to show that quantum probability can be interpreted as Bayesian probability, and this interpretation is not only theoretically self - consistent but also can better understand the relationship between information and probability in quantum systems.