A Value-Oriented Investigation of Photoshop's Generative Fill

Ian P. Swift,Debaleena Chattopadhyay
2024-05-06
Abstract:The creative industry is both concerned and enthusiastic about how generative AI will reshape creativity. How might these tools interact with the workflow values of creative artists? In this paper, we adopt a value-sensitive design framework to examine how generative AI, particularly Photoshop's Generative Fill (GF), helps or hinders creative professionals' values. We obtained 566 unique posts about GF from online forums for creative professionals who use Photoshop in their current work practices. We conducted reflexive thematic analysis focusing on usefulness, ease of use, and user values. Users found GF useful in doing touch-ups, expanding images, and generating composite images. GF helped users' values of productivity by making work efficient but created a value tension around creativity: it helped reduce barriers to creativity but hindered distinguishing 'human' from algorithmic art. Furthermore, GF hindered lived experiences shaping creativity and hindered the honed prideful skills of creative work.
Human-Computer Interaction
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### What problems does this paper attempt to solve? The paper "A Value - Oriented Investigation of Photoshop’s Generative Fill" attempts to explore how generative artificial intelligence (especially Photoshop's Generative Fill feature, abbreviated as GF) affects the workflow values of creative professionals. Specifically, the researchers adopted the Value - Sensitive Design (VSD) framework and analyzed user posts in online forums to explore the following aspects: 1. **Usefulness and ease - of - use of GF**: - The researchers analyzed in which tasks GF was useful to users, such as image restoration, image expansion, and prototype image generation. - They evaluated whether the use of GF simplified these tasks and improved work efficiency. 2. **Embodiment of user values**: - The researchers focused on how GF affected users' productivity, creativity, and the ability to distinguish "real" art. - They explored whether GF, while improving efficiency, also had a negative impact on creativity, for example, users were confused about distinguishing between "human - made" creations and algorithm - generated creations. 3. **Value conflicts**: - The researchers identified value conflicts that occurred during the use of GF, such as the contradiction between productivity improvement and creativity decline. - They analyzed how GF affected users' actual experiences and sense of achievement, especially whether it weakened users' skills and pride while reducing manual operations. 4. **Ethical and social impacts**: - The researchers discussed the ethical issues of GF in terms of privacy, dignity, and freedom of expression. - They explored the importance of technology regulation, such as the guidelines set by Adobe to prevent the generation of illegal content. Through these analyses, the paper aims to provide a comprehensive perspective to understand how generative AI tools affect the values of creative professionals in practical applications and to provide references for future design and policy - making.