Art and the science of generative AI: A deeper dive

Ziv Epstein,Aaron Hertzmann,Laura Herman,Robert Mahari,Morgan R. Frank,Matthew Groh,Hope Schroeder,Amy Smith,Memo Akten,Jessica Fjeld,Hany Farid,Neil Leach,Alex Pentland,Olga Russakovsky

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adh4451

2023-06-07

Abstract:A new class of tools, colloquially called generative AI, can produce high-quality artistic media for visual arts, concept art, music, fiction, literature, video, and animation. The generative capabilities of these tools are likely to fundamentally alter the creative processes by which creators formulate ideas and put them into production. As creativity is reimagined, so too may be many sectors of society. Understanding the impact of generative AI - and making policy decisions around it - requires new interdisciplinary scientific inquiry into culture, economics, law, algorithms, and the interaction of technology and creativity. We argue that generative AI is not the harbinger of art's demise, but rather is a new medium with its own distinct affordances. In this vein, we consider the impacts of this new medium on creators across four themes: aesthetics and culture, legal questions of ownership and credit, the future of creative work, and impacts on the contemporary media ecosystem. Across these themes, we highlight key research questions and directions to inform policy and beneficial uses of the technology.

Artificial Intelligence

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper explores the application of generative AI in the field of artistic creation and its impact on various aspects of society. Specifically, the paper attempts to answer the following questions:

1. **Generative AI as a New Medium**: Generative AI tools can produce high-quality artworks, such as visual arts, music, literature, etc. These tools may fundamentally change the way creators conceive and realize their ideas. The author believes that generative AI is not a harbinger of the end of art but a new medium with unique expressiveness.

2. **Need for Interdisciplinary Research**: To understand the impact of generative AI and formulate relevant policies, interdisciplinary research is needed on the interaction between culture, economy, law, and the relationship between technology and creativity.

3. **Ethical and Legal Challenges**: Generative AI relies on training data, which raises issues regarding data sources, copyright ownership, and creative intent. Additionally, the automated creation process challenges traditional concepts of authorship and ownership.

4. **Cultural and Aesthetic Changes**: As generative AI tools become more widespread, they may reshape artistic practices, role divisions, and aesthetic standards. Moreover, due to biases in training data, they may also lead to homogenization in cultural production.

5. **Impact on Labor Economics**: While automation technologies typically increase productivity in certain types of work, they may also threaten some creative job positions. Therefore, new frameworks are needed to analyze how generative AI affects the labor market in the creative industries.

6. **Impact on the Media Ecosystem**: Generative AI reduces the cost of synthetic media, which not only changes the way information is disseminated but also brings risks such as fake information and involuntary pornographic content. Therefore, establishing credibility assessment mechanisms becomes particularly important.

In summary, this paper aims to comprehensively examine the multifaceted impact of generative AI on the art world and society as a whole, and calls for joint exploration on how to maximize the benefits of this technology while avoiding potential negative impacts.