Abstract:IntroductionBatch effects in large untargeted metabolomics experiments are almost unavoidable, especially when sensitive detection techniques like mass spectrometry (MS) are employed. In order to obtain peak intensities that are comparable across all batches, corrections need to be performed. Since non-detects, i.e., signals with an intensity too low to be detected with certainty, are common in metabolomics studies, the batch correction methods need to take these into account.ObjectivesThis paper aims to compare several batch correction methods, and investigates the effect of different strategies for handling non-detects.MethodsBatch correction methods usually consist of regression models, possibly also accounting for trends within batches. To fit these models quality control samples (QCs), injected at regular intervals, can be used. Also study samples can be used, provided that the injection order is properly randomized. Normalization methods, not using information on batch labels or injection order, can correct for batch effects as well. Introducing two easy-to-use quality criteria, we assess the merits of these batch correction strategies using three large LC–MS and GC–MS data sets of samples from Arabidopsis thaliana.ResultsThe three data sets have very different characteristics, leading to clearly distinct behaviour of the batch correction strategies studied. Explicit inclusion of information on batch and injection order in general leads to very good corrections; when enough QCs are available, also general normalization approaches perform well. Several approaches are shown to be able to handle non-detects—replacing them with very small numbers such as zero seems the worst of the approaches considered.ConclusionThe use of quality control samples for batch correction leads to good results when enough QCs are available. If an experiment is properly set up, batch correction using the study samples usually leads to a similar high-quality correction, but has the advantage that more metabolites are corrected. The strategy for handling non-detects is important: choosing small values like zero can lead to suboptimal batch corrections.

WiNNbeta: Batch and drift correction method by white noise normalization for metabolomic studies

Norm ISWSVR: A Data Integration and Normalization Approach for Large-Scale Metabolomics

Assessment of batch-correction methods for scRNA-seq data with a new test metric

A test metric for assessing single-cell RNA-seq batch correction

Improved batch correction in untargeted MS-based metabolomics

BERNN: Enhancing classification of Liquid Chromatography Mass Spectrometry data with batch effect removal neural networks

WaveICA 2.0: a Novel Batch Effect Removal Method for Untargeted Metabolomics Data Without Using Batch Information.

Large-scale Untargeted LC-MS Metabolomics Data Correction Using Between-Batch Feature Alignment and Cluster-Based Within-Batch Signal Intensity Drift Correction.

A Novel Bioinformatics Approach to Identify the Consistently Well-Performing Normalization Strategy for Current Metabolomic Studies

Joint deep learning for batch effect removal and classification toward MALDI MS based metabolomics

Normalization Approach by a Reference Material to Improve LC-MS-Based Metabolomic Data Comparability of Multibatch Samples.

AMDBNorm: an approach based on distribution adjustment to eliminate batch effects of gene expression data

Denoising Autoencoder Normalization for Large-Scale Untargeted Metabolomics by Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry

Detecting Hidden Batch Factors Through Data-Adaptive Adjustment for Biological Effects.

Ckbet: Assessing Goodness of Batch Effect Correction for Single-Cell RNA-seq

A Novel Strategy for Large-Scale Metabolomics Study by Calibrating Gross and Systematic Errors in Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry

Ismnn: Batch Effect Correction for Single-Cell RNA-seq Data Via Iterative Supervised Mutual Nearest Neighbor Refinement.

Correcting batch effects in large-scale multiomic studies using a reference-material-based ratio method

NOREVA: normalization and evaluation of MS-based metabolomics data

Baseline correction of high resolution spectral profile data based on exponential smoothing

Normalization and integration of large-scale metabolomics data using support vector regression