Abstract:The batch effect among scRNA‐seq datasets is commonly corrected based on reference and in embedding space. An algorithm is presented that enables removing batch effect in a reference‐free manner and preserving molecular feature space. By extensive comparison with 13 methods, its superior performance in terms of both effectiveness and efficiency is demonstrated. Datasets with more than 10 000 cells can be integrated in 5 min. Additionally, the gene expression space is preserved. Integrating multiple single‐cell datasets is essential for the comprehensive understanding of cell heterogeneity. Batch effect is the undesired systematic variations among technologies or experimental laboratories that distort biological signals and hinder the integration of single‐cell datasets. However, existing methods typically rely on a selected dataset as a reference, leading to inconsistent integration performance using different references, or embed cells into uninterpretable low‐dimensional feature space. To overcome these limitations, a reference‐free method, Beaconet, for integrating multiple single‐cell transcriptomic datasets in original molecular space by aligning the global distribution of each batch using an adversarial correction network is presented. Through extensive comparisons with 13 state‐of‐the‐art methods, it is demonstrated that Beaconet can effectively remove batch effect while preserving biological variations and is superior to existing unsupervised methods using all possible references in overall performance. Furthermore, Beaconet performs integration in the original molecular feature space, enabling the characterization of cell types and downstream differential expression analysis directly using integrated data with gene‐expression features. Additionally, when applying to large‐scale atlas data integration, Beaconet shows notable advantages in both time‐ and space‐efficiencies. In summary, Beaconet serves as an effective and efficient batch effect removal tool that can facilitate the integration of single‐cell datasets in a reference‐free and molecular feature‐preserved mode.

A test metric for assessing single-cell RNA-seq batch correction

Assessment of batch-correction methods for scRNA-seq data with a new test metric

Ckbet: Assessing Goodness of Batch Effect Correction for Single-Cell RNA-seq

Case-specific selection of batch correction methods for integrating single-cell transcriptomic data from different sources

A benchmark of batch-effect correction methods for single-cell RNA sequencing data

EBT: a Statistic Test Identifying Moderate Size of Significant Features with Balanced Power and Precision for Genome-Wide Rate Comparisons

Evaluating batch correction methods for image-based cell profiling

Batch correction methods used in single cell RNA-sequencing analyses are often poorly calibrated

Scbatch: Batch-Effect Correction of RNA-seq Data Through Sample Distance Matrix Adjustment

Ismnn: Batch Effect Correction for Single-Cell RNA-seq Data Via Iterative Supervised Mutual Nearest Neighbor Refinement.

SSBER: removing batch effect for single-cell RNA sequencing data

REBET: a method to determine the number of cell clusters based on batch effect removal

Dropout Imputation and Batch Effect Correction for Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Data

scRNABatchQC: multi-samples quality control for single cell RNA-seq data

Beaconet: A Reference‐Free Method for Integrating Multiple Batches of Single‐Cell Transcriptomic Data in Original Molecular Space

Batch effects in single-cell RNA-sequencing data are corrected by matching mutual nearest neighbors

Correcting batch effects in large-scale multiomic studies using a reference-material-based ratio method

Comprehensive Evaluation of Noise Reduction Methods for Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Data

Highly Effective Batch Effect Correction Method for RNA-seq Count Data

The significance of molecular heterogeneity in breast cancer batch correction and dataset integration

ComBat-seq: batch effect adjustment for RNA-seq count data