Abstract:IntroductionBatch effects in large untargeted metabolomics experiments are almost unavoidable, especially when sensitive detection techniques like mass spectrometry (MS) are employed. In order to obtain peak intensities that are comparable across all batches, corrections need to be performed. Since non-detects, i.e., signals with an intensity too low to be detected with certainty, are common in metabolomics studies, the batch correction methods need to take these into account.ObjectivesThis paper aims to compare several batch correction methods, and investigates the effect of different strategies for handling non-detects.MethodsBatch correction methods usually consist of regression models, possibly also accounting for trends within batches. To fit these models quality control samples (QCs), injected at regular intervals, can be used. Also study samples can be used, provided that the injection order is properly randomized. Normalization methods, not using information on batch labels or injection order, can correct for batch effects as well. Introducing two easy-to-use quality criteria, we assess the merits of these batch correction strategies using three large LC–MS and GC–MS data sets of samples from Arabidopsis thaliana.ResultsThe three data sets have very different characteristics, leading to clearly distinct behaviour of the batch correction strategies studied. Explicit inclusion of information on batch and injection order in general leads to very good corrections; when enough QCs are available, also general normalization approaches perform well. Several approaches are shown to be able to handle non-detects—replacing them with very small numbers such as zero seems the worst of the approaches considered.ConclusionThe use of quality control samples for batch correction leads to good results when enough QCs are available. If an experiment is properly set up, batch correction using the study samples usually leads to a similar high-quality correction, but has the advantage that more metabolites are corrected. The strategy for handling non-detects is important: choosing small values like zero can lead to suboptimal batch corrections.

Joint deep learning for batch effect removal and classification toward MALDI MS based metabolomics

BERNN: Enhancing classification of Liquid Chromatography Mass Spectrometry data with batch effect removal neural networks

Deep Neural Networks for Classification of LC-MS Spectral Peaks.

An end-to-end deep learning method for mass spectrometry data analysis to reveal disease-specific metabolic profiles

NormAE: Deep Adversarial Learning Model to Remove Batch Effects in Liquid Chromatography Mass Spectrometry-Based Metabolomics Data.

An integrated deep learning framework for the interpretation of untargeted metabolomics data

Deep metabolome: Applications of deep learning in metabolomics

Applications of machine learning in metabolomics: Disease modeling and classification

WaveICA 2.0: a Novel Batch Effect Removal Method for Untargeted Metabolomics Data Without Using Batch Information.

Pseudotargeted Metabolomic Fingerprinting and Deep Learning for Identification and Visualization of Common Pathogens

Removal of Batch Effects using Distribution-Matching Residual Networks

Improved batch correction in untargeted MS-based metabolomics

deepMNN: Deep Learning-Based Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Data Batch Correction Using Mutual Nearest Neighbors

Mixed Effects Deep Learning for the interpretable analysis of single cell RNA sequencing data by quantifying and visualizing batch effects

The Effect of Data Integration on LC-MS-based Metabolomics Data: Evaluation on the Comparative Classification Capacities

A Comprehensive Evaluation of Metabolomics Data Preprocessing Methods for Deep Learning

Chemical Space Localization for Unknown Metabolite Annotation via Semantic Similarity of Mass Spectral Language

Enhancing mass spectrometry data analysis: A novel framework for calibration, outlier detection, and classification

Combining MALDI-MS with machine learning for metabolomic characterization of lung cancer patient sera

The development of machine learning approaches in two-dimensional NMR data interpretation for metabolomics applications

Multiple Compounds Recognition from the Tandem Mass Spectral Data Using Convolutional Neural Network.