Abstract:Most gravitational wave (GW) events observed by the LIGO and Virgo detectors are consistent with mergers of binary black holes (BBHs) on quasi-circular orbits. However, some events are also consistent with non-zero orbital eccentricity, which can indicate that the binary formed via dynamical interactions. Active GW search pipelines using quasi-circular waveform templates are inefficient for detecting eccentric mergers. Also, analysing eccentric GW signals with waveform models neglecting eccentricity can lead to biases in the recovered parameters. We explore the detectability and characterisation of eccentric signals when searches and analyses rely on quasi-circular waveform models. We find that for a reference eccentric population, the fraction of events having fitting factor (FF) $< 0.95$ can be up to $\approx 2.2\%$ compared to $\approx 0.4\%$ for the baseline population. This leads to the loss in signal recovery fraction for up to $6\%$ for parameter space with non-negligible eccentricity ($e_{10} > 0.01$) and high mass ratio ($q > 3$). We perform parameter estimation (PE) for non-spinning and aligned-spin eccentric GW injections from BBHs with a total mass $M=35 M_\odot$, based on numerical relativity simulations and an EOB based inspiral-merger-ringdown model (TEOBResumS). We recover these injections using both quasi-circular and eccentric waveform models. For cases with $e_{20} \sim 0.1$, quasi-circular models fail to estimate chirp mass within the 90% credible interval accurately. Further, for these low-mass injections, spin-induced precession does not mimic eccentricity. For injections of $e_{20}\sim 0.1$, PE conducted with an inspiral-only eccentric waveform model correctly characterises the injected signal to within 90% confidence, and recovers the injected eccentricities, suggesting that such models are sufficient for characterisation of low-mass eccentric BBH. (abridged)

Systematic bias from waveform modeling for binary black hole populations in next-generation gravitational wave detectors

Systematic bias from waveform modeling for binary black hole populations in next-generation gravitational wave detectors

Systematic Biases in Estimating the Properties of Black Holes Due to Inaccurate Gravitational-Wave Models

Systematic bias due to mismodelling precessing binary black hole ringdown

Comparing gravitational waveform models for binary black hole mergers through a hypermodels approach

Accuracy limitations of existing numerical relativity waveforms on the data analysis of current and future ground-based detectors

Waveform accuracy and systematic uncertainties in current gravitational wave observations

Waveform systematics in gravitational-wave inference of signals from binary neutron star merger models incorporating higher-order modes information

Systematic biases in parametrized tests of general relativity due to waveform mismodeling: the impact of neglecting spin precession and higher modes

Impact of gravitational waveform model systematics on the measurement of the Hubble constant

Incorporating waveform calibration error in gravitational-wave modeling and inference for SEOBNRv4

Waveform systematics in gravitational-wave inference of signals from binary neutron star merger models incorporating higher order modes information

Stealth bias in gravitational-wave parameter estimation

Blind spots and biases: the dangers of ignoring eccentricity in gravitational-wave signals from binary black holes

Measuring violations of General Relativity from single gravitational wave detection by non-spinning binary systems: higher-order asymptotic analysis

Enriching the Symphony of Gravitational Waves from Binary Black Holes by Tuning Higher Harmonics

The Gravitational Wave Bias Parameter from Angular Power Spectra: Bridging Between Galaxies and Binary Black Holes

A phenomenological gravitational waveform model of binary black holes incorporating horizon fluxes

Eccentricity-induced systematic error on parametrized tests of general relativity: Hierarchical Bayesian inference applied to a binary black hole population