Numerical evaluation of code live-load models for estimating the forces caused by actual vehicles that act on bridge substructures

Alejandro Hernandez-Martinez,Adrian D. Garcia-Soto,Jesus G. Valdes-Vazquez

2024-01-16

Abstract:The present paper assesses the efficacy of code live-load models in accurately estimating the vehicular loads transferred to bridge substructures, such as abutments, piers, and foundations. Realistic traffic vehicle data are represented using four Weigh-in-Motion databases, which provide an authentic representation of vehicle information, thus providing a realistic basis for the examination of the bridges studied. The evaluation includes various bridge models, such as single-span girder bridges and two-, three-, and four-span continuous pinned-support girder bridges. By analyzing exceedance rates, the study compares the extreme force values obtained for vehicles in the databases with those predicted by selected code live-load models. These exceedance rates are presented in spectra format, as a function of the span length. The significant variations observed in the exceedance rates highlight the need for improving existing code live-load models to achieve more accurate estimations of the forces transferred to bridge substructures. Such improvements would lead to more uniform reliability levels for any limit state, such as resistance, fatigue, serviceability, and cracking.

Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper mainly evaluates the accuracy of Code Live-Load Models (LLMs) in estimating the loads exerted on bridge substructures (such as piers, abutments, and foundations) by actual vehicles. The study uses four Weigh-in-Motion (WIM) databases to represent real traffic vehicle data and compares the exceedance rates of extreme load values and LLMs predicted values on different bridge models (including single-span girder bridges and multi-span continuous jointed girder bridges). By analyzing the exceedance rate spectra, the authors found significant differences in the existing LLMs under different span lengths, emphasizing the need to improve the models to more accurately estimate the forces transferred to bridge substructures and thereby improve the reliability levels of any limit states (such as resistance, fatigue, serviceability, and cracking).

The paper points out that most Code LLMs are designed to predict the maximum force effects on the upper structure of bridges, but they do not always accurately estimate the forces acting on the support points. Current research mostly uses a single Code LLM to simulate traffic loads on bridges, and the paper reveals the potential problems of this approach by comparing the force values predicted by LLMs with the vehicle data in the WIM database. The paper also discusses different LLMs in various design specifications, including T3-S3, T3-S2-R4, IMT-66.5, HL-93, CL-625, and CL-625-ONT models, and evaluates the representativeness of these models in estimating the reaction forces of critical bridge components (such as bearings) by comparing the exceedance rates of different span bridge models.

Through analysis, the paper concludes that existing LLMs have shortcomings in estimating bridge support forces, resulting in inconsistent exceedance rates, which emphasizes the need for calibration of Code LLMs to achieve more uniform reliability levels. The research findings are of significant importance for improving bridge design and evaluating the performance of substructures.