Endogenous Fragility in Opaque Supply Chains

Andrea Titton
2024-03-25
Abstract:This paper investigates the role of supply chain unobservability in generating endogenously fragile production networks. In a simple production game, in which firms need to multisource to hedge against suppliers' risk under unobservability, firms underdiversify vis-a-vis the social optimum. The unobservability of suppliers' relations is the driver behind this. In production networks where upstream risk is highly correlated and supplier relationships are not observable, the marginal risk reduction of adding an additional supplier is low, because this additional supplier's risk is likely to be correlated to that of existing suppliers. This channel reduces firm incentives to diversify, which gives rise to inefficiently fragile production networks. By solving the social planner problem, I show that, if the risk reduction experienced downstream resulting from upstream diversification were to be internalised by upstream firms, endogenous production networks would be resilient to most levels of risk. Furthermore, I show that the opaqueness of the supply chain yields less fragile but more inefficient production networks. Despite its stylised form,the model identifies the trade-off firms face when diversifying risk and isolates the mechanism that aggregates these decisions into a production network. Furthermore, it maps the conditions of the trade-off, such as expected profits of the firm or the pairing costs, to the properties of the production network.
Theoretical Economics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper attempts to address the issue of endogenous fragility within production networks caused by supply chain opacity. Specifically: 1. **Impact of Supply Chain Opacity**: The paper explores how companies make multisourcing decisions in the context of an opaque supply chain and how these decisions affect the resilience of the entire production network. Due to the lack of transparency in supplier relationships, the marginal reduction in risk faced by companies when adding additional suppliers is lower, as the risks of new suppliers are likely correlated with those of existing suppliers. This leads to insufficient risk diversification by companies, resulting in an inefficient and fragile production network. 2. **Theoretical Model and Results**: By establishing a simplified production game model, the authors demonstrate that if the risk reduction brought by upstream firms' diversification can be internalized by downstream firms, the production network will be resilient to most risk levels. Additionally, the paper points out that supply chain opacity leads to a more fragile but less efficient production network. Although the model is formalized, it reveals the trade-offs companies face when diversifying risk and maps these trade-off conditions (such as expected profit or pairing costs) to the attributes of the production network. 3. **Empirical Analysis and Case Study**: The paper illustrates the role of supplier correlation in disrupting production network stability and its importance for corporate procurement decisions by analyzing the impact of Hurricane Laura on the petrochemical regions of Louisiana and Texas in the United States. In this context, the paper further explores the relationship between supply chain opacity, corporate diversification decisions, and production network fragility. In summary, the paper aims to understand how supply chain opacity affects corporate procurement strategies and ultimately leads to the overall fragility of the production network through theoretical modeling and empirical analysis.