Uncertainty of Supply Chains: Risk and Ambiguity

d'Artis Kancs
2024-05-06
Abstract:Motivated by the recently experienced systemic shocks (the COVID-19 pandemic and the full-fledged Russia's war of aggression against Ukraine) - that have created new forms of uncertainties to our supplies - this paper explores the supply chain robustness under risk aversion and ambiguity aversion. We aim to understand the potential consequences of deeply uncertain systemic events on the supply chain resilience and how does the information precision affect individual agents' choices and the chain-level preparedness to aggregate shocks. Augmenting a parsimonious supply chain model with uncertainty, we analyse the relationship between the upstream sourcing decisions and the supply chain survival probability. Both risk-averse and ambiguity-averse individually-optimising agents' upstream sourcing paths are efficient but can become vulnerable to aggregate shocks. In contrast, a chain-level coordination of downstream firm sourcing decisions can qualitatively improve the robustness of the entire supply chain compared to the individual decision-making baseline. Such a robust decision making ensures that in the presence of an aggregate shock - independently of its realisation - part of upstream suppliers will survive and the final goods' supply will be ensured even under the most demanding circumstances. Our results also indicate that an input source diversification extracts a cost in foregone efficiency.
General Economics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper discusses the resilience and robustness of global supply chains in the face of risks and uncertainties, such as the COVID-19 pandemic and Russia's full-scale invasion war on Ukraine. The authors analyze how upstream procurement decisions affect the survival probability of the supply chain by establishing a concise supply chain model that includes uncertainty. They also investigate how information accuracy affects the choices of individual agents and their preparedness for overall impacts. The study finds that although individually optimal upstream procurement paths for risk and ambiguity avoidance may be effective, they can become fragile when facing systemic shocks. In contrast, coordinated procurement decisions by downstream firms can enhance the resilience of the entire supply chain, surpassing the performance of individual decision baselines. This decision approach ensures the survival of some upstream suppliers even in the most severe cases and guarantees the supply of final goods. The paper also points out that diversification of input sources comes at the cost of efficiency loss. By simulating different upstream procurement strategies, the authors reveal the trade-offs between enhancing supply chain resilience and resource allocation in an uncertain environment. They apply a multi-prior framework to deal with risks and ambiguities and find that decision-makers who avoid ambiguity can enhance resilience by dispersing upstream suppliers, but this also means sacrificing efficiency during normal periods. For policymakers, this implies the need to mobilize resources to enhance the resilience and robustness of supply chains, such as reducing the cost of diversification for upstream suppliers through financial incentives. The research also provides insights into the efficiency-resilience debate in policy-making under deep uncertainty and emphasizes the necessity of understanding international input dependencies to identify potential vulnerabilities. By analyzing recent data, the paper demonstrates an increasing level of reliance on external inputs by alliance countries, particularly inputs from China, which may exacerbate the fragility of the alliance. In addition, the pressure index of global supply chains shows that since 2020, the frequency and scope of supply chain disruptions have been increasing. In conclusion, the paper aims to address how to enhance the resilience and robustness of supply chains in an environment where risks and uncertainties coexist, as well as how to balance efficiency and security through policy interventions.