Abstract:Purpose In light of the recently experienced systemic shocks (the COVID-19 pandemic and the war in Ukraine), we investigate supply chain robustness. We aim to understand the potential consequences of uncertain events or adversary's action on critical supplies in the Alliance. Design/methodology/approach We leverage a parsimonious supply chain model and investigate the relationship between upstream supplier concentration/diversification and the supply chain's robustness (survival probability) in the presence of uncertain systemic shocks. In several scenarios of shock events, we simulate alternative input sourcing strategies in the presence of uncertainty. Findings A firm-level cost-focused optimisation may lead all upstream suppliers to concentrate in one location, which – when subsequently hit by a shock – would result in a disruption of the entire supply chain. A chain-level forward-looking optimisation diversifies the upstream supplier location and sourcing decisions. As a result, the supply chain's survival probability is maximised, and critical supplies will continue even under the most demanding circumstances. Research limitations/implications Our findings encourage political and military decision makers to enhance upstream supply chain robustness in critical and strategic sectors, such as the diversification of nitrocellulose supplies currently sourced almost exclusively from China by European gunpowder manufacturers. Practical implications Our findings have direct recommendations to supply chain downstream decision makers and to the government's policy choices. Since global supply chain (GSC) disruptions in critical sectors may have catastrophic impacts on social welfare and the probability of shocks such as COVID-19 and Russia's war may not be known even approximately, robust decision rules seem to be the appropriate tools for policymaking in critical and strategic sectors such as energy supplies, food and water, communication and defence. A robust supply chain is one in which the survival probability is maximised, which we show in a central planner strategy's simulations. Originality/value The paper shows formally why a market-based global input sourcing strategy may be efficient from an individual firm's perspective but may be suboptimal from a societal resilience perspective.

Dual Sourcing and Resilient Supply Chains: The Case of Essential Resources

Resilient and sustainable energy supply chains: insights on sourcing and pricing strategies in a non-collaborative and collaborative environment

Dual sourcing under supply disruption with risk-averse suppliers in the sharing economy

Dual sourcing under suppliers' capacity investments

Dual sourcing under disruption risk and cost improvement through learning

Enhancing resilience: model-based simulations

A two-stage capacity reservation contract model with backup sourcing considering supply side disruptions

Contingent management of supply chain disruption: Effects of dual or triple sourcing

Dual Sourcing Decisions under Exchange Rate and Supply Risks

Product substitution and dual sourcing under random supply failures

On the Value of Mitigation and Contingency Strategies for Managing Supply Chain Disruption Risks

On the loss-averse dual-sourcing problem under supply disruption

Dual sourcing for mitigating humanitarian supply chain disruptions

A stochastic inventory management model for a dual sourcing supply chain with disruptions

Contingent or stable dual sourcing? The preferences of manufacturers and suppliers under supply disruption and competition

Uncertainty of Supply Chains: Risk and Ambiguity

Managing supply chain risks with dual sourcing: Bayesian learning of censored supply capacity

Strategic Sourcing in Forward and Spot Markets with Reliable and Unreliable Suppliers

Dual sourcing: Creating and utilizing flexible capacities with a second supply source

A Game-Theoretic Approach for Pricing in a Two Competitive Closed-Loop Supply Chains Considering a Dual-Sourcing Strategy in The Presence of a Disruption Risk

Supply chain finance: how do supply chain strategies perform in mitigating supply chain disruption and commodity price volatility risks?