Crowd Guilds: Worker-led Reputation and Feedback on Crowdsourcing Platforms
Mark E. Whiting,Dilrukshi Gamage,Snehalkumar S. Gaikwad,Aaron Gilbee,Shirish Goyal,Alipta Ballav,Dinesh Majeti,Nalin Chhibber,Angela Richmond-Fuller,Freddie Vargus,Tejas Seshadri Sarma,Varshine Chandrakanthan,Teogenes Moura,Mohamed Hashim Salih,Gabriel Bayomi Tinoco Kalejaiye,Adam Ginzberg,Catherine A. Mullings,Yoni Dayan,Kristy Milland,Henrique Orefice,Jeff Regino,Sayna Parsi,Kunz Mainali,Vibhor Sehgal,Sekandar Matin,Akshansh Sinha,Rajan Vaish,Michael S. Bernstein
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998234
2017-03-01
Abstract:Crowd workers are distributed and decentralized. While decentralization is designed to utilize independent judgment to promote high-quality results, it paradoxically undercuts behaviors and institutions that are critical to high-quality work. Reputation is one central example: crowdsourcing systems depend on reputation scores from decentralized workers and requesters, but these scores are notoriously inflated and uninformative. In this paper, we draw inspiration from historical worker guilds (e.g., in the silk trade) to design and implement crowd guilds: centralized groups of crowd workers who collectively certify each other's quality through double-blind peer assessment. A two-week field experiment compared crowd guilds to a traditional decentralized crowd work model. Crowd guilds produced reputation signals more strongly correlated with ground-truth worker quality than signals available on current crowd working platforms, and more accurate than in the traditional model.
Human-Computer Interaction