Abstract:Finding the right balance of quality and quantity can be important, and it is essential that project quality does not drop below the level where important main conclusions are missed or misstated. We use knock-out and over-expression studies as a simplification to test recovery of a known causal gene in RNA-Seq cell line experiments. When single-end RNA-Seq reads are aligned with STAR and quantified with htseq-count, we found potential value in testing the use of the Generalized Linear Model (GLM) implementation of edgeR with robust dispersion estimation more frequently for either single-variate or multi-variate 2-group comparisons (with the possibility of defining criteria less stringent than |fold-change| > 1.5 and FDR < 0.05). When considering a limited number of patient sample comparisons with larger sample size, there might be some decreased variability between methods (except for DESeq1). However, at the same time, the ranking of the gene identified using immunohistochemistry (for ER/PR/HER2 in breast cancer samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas) showed as possible shift in performance compared to the cell line comparisons, potentially highlighting utility for standard statistical tests and/or limma-based analysis with larger sample sizes. If this continues to be true in additional studies and comparisons, then that could be consistent with the possibility that it may be important to allocate time for potential methods troubleshooting for genomics projects. Analysis of public data presented in this study does not consider all experimental designs, and presentation of downstream analysis is limited. So, any estimate from this simplification would be an underestimation of the true need for some methods testing for every project. Additionally, this set of independent cell line experiments has a limitation in being able to determine the frequency of missing a highly important gene if the problem is rare (such as 10% or lower). For example, if there was an assumption that only one method can be tested for “initial” analysis, then it is not completely clear to the extent that using edgeR-robust might perform better than DESeq2 in the cell line experiments. Importantly, we do not wish to cause undue concern, and we believe that it should often be possible to define a gene expression differential expression workflow that is suitable for some purposes for many samples. Nevertheless, at the same time, we provide a variety of measures that we believe emphasize the need to critically assess every individual project and maximize confidence in published results.

Debiased Projected Two-Sample Comparisonscfor Single-Cell Expression Data

Automatic identification of relevant genes from low-dimensional embeddings of single-cell RNA-seq data.

Likelihood-based deconvolution of bulk gene expression data using single-cell references

From local to global gene co-expression estimation using single-cell RNA-seq data

Debiased inference for heterogeneous subpopulations in a high-dimensional logistic regression model

Statistical Inference for Cell Type Deconvolution

A Strategy to Compare Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Data Sets Provides Phenotypic Insight into Cellular Heterogeneity Underlying Biological Similarities and Differences Between Samples

Efficient Bayesian High-Dimensional Classification via Random Projection with Application to Gene Expression Data

Repro Samples Method for High-dimensional Logistic Model

A Comparison for Dimensionality Reduction Methods of Single-Cell RNA-seq Data

FastProject: a tool for low-dimensional analysis of single-cell RNA-Seq data

Preprocessing of Single Cell RNA Sequencing Data Using Correlated Clustering and Projection

BASiCS: Bayesian Analysis of Single-Cell Sequencing Data

Bayesian Optimal Two-sample Tests in High-dimension

Assessing transcriptomic heterogeneity of single-cell RNASeq data by bulk-level gene expression data

Projection-based two-sample inference for sparsely observed multivariate functional data

Benchmarking integration of single-cell differential expression

Conditional Similarity Triplets Enable Covariate-Informed Representations of Single-Cell Data

A Two-Part Mixed Model for Differential Expression Analysis in Single-Cell High-Throughput Gene Expression Data.

Critical Differential Expression Assessment for Individual Bulk RNA-Seq Projects

Theoretical framework for the difference of two negative binomial distributions and its application in comparative analysis of sequencing data