Abstract:Finding the right balance of quality and quantity can be important, and it is essential that project quality does not drop below the level where important main conclusions are missed or misstated. We use knock-out and over-expression studies as a simplification to test recovery of a known causal gene in RNA-Seq cell line experiments. When single-end RNA-Seq reads are aligned with STAR and quantified with htseq-count, we found potential value in testing the use of the Generalized Linear Model (GLM) implementation of edgeR with robust dispersion estimation more frequently for either single-variate or multi-variate 2-group comparisons (with the possibility of defining criteria less stringent than |fold-change| > 1.5 and FDR < 0.05). When considering a limited number of patient sample comparisons with larger sample size, there might be some decreased variability between methods (except for DESeq1). However, at the same time, the ranking of the gene identified using immunohistochemistry (for ER/PR/HER2 in breast cancer samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas) showed as possible shift in performance compared to the cell line comparisons, potentially highlighting utility for standard statistical tests and/or limma-based analysis with larger sample sizes. If this continues to be true in additional studies and comparisons, then that could be consistent with the possibility that it may be important to allocate time for potential methods troubleshooting for genomics projects. Analysis of public data presented in this study does not consider all experimental designs, and presentation of downstream analysis is limited. So, any estimate from this simplification would be an underestimation of the true need for some methods testing for every project. Additionally, this set of independent cell line experiments has a limitation in being able to determine the frequency of missing a highly important gene if the problem is rare (such as 10% or lower). For example, if there was an assumption that only one method can be tested for “initial” analysis, then it is not completely clear to the extent that using edgeR-robust might perform better than DESeq2 in the cell line experiments. Importantly, we do not wish to cause undue concern, and we believe that it should often be possible to define a gene expression differential expression workflow that is suitable for some purposes for many samples. Nevertheless, at the same time, we provide a variety of measures that we believe emphasize the need to critically assess every individual project and maximize confidence in published results.

Critical Differential Expression Assessment for Individual Bulk RNA-Seq Projects

A Novel Approach to Detect Differentially Expressed Genes from Count-Based Digital Databases by Normalizing with Housekeeping Genes.

Differential expression analysis of multifactor RNA-Seq experiments with respect to biological variation

Degps is a Powerful Tool for Detecting Differential Expression in RNA-sequencing Studies

Differential analysis in Transcriptomic: The strength of randomly picking 'reference' genes

A two-step strategy for detecting differential gene expression in cDNA microarray data

Could dropping a few cells change the takeaways from differential expression?

Comparative analysis of differential gene expression analysis tools for single-cell RNA sequencing data

A Rank-Based Algorithm of Differential Expression Analysis for Small Cell Line Data with Statistical Control.

Bias, robustness and scalability in differential expression analysis of single-cell RNA-seq data

A comprehensive assessment of cell type-specific differential expression methods in bulk data.

Experimental validation of methods for differential gene expression analysis and sample pooling in RNA-seq

Three Differential Expression Analysis Methods for RNA Sequencing: limma, EdgeR, DESeq2

Power analysis and sample size estimation for RNA-Seq differential expression

Toward Best Practice in Identifying Subtle Differential Expression with RNA-seq: A Real-World Multi-Center Benchmarking Study Using Quartet and MAQC Reference Materials

Evaluation of tools for differential gene expression analysis by RNA-seq on a 48 biological replicate experiment

Robustly detecting differential expression in RNA sequencing data using observation weights

The balance of reproducibility, sensitivity, and specificity of lists of differentially expressed genes in microarray studies

Modeling expression ranks for noise-tolerant differential expression analysis of scRNA-seq data

Differential Expression Analyses for Single-Cell RNA-Seq: Old Questions on New Data

A comparison of methods for differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data