Ulrich Pototschnig,Martin Matas,David Scheiblehner,David Neuschitzer,Robert Obenaus-Emler,Helmut Antrekowitsch,David Holec
Abstract:Methane pyrolysis provides a scalable alternative to conventional hydrogen production methods, avoiding greenhouse gas emissions. However, high operating temperatures limit economic feasibility on an industrial scale. A major scientific goal is, therefore, to find a catalyst material that lowers operating temperatures, making methane pyrolysis economically viable. In this work, we derive a model that provides a qualitative comparison of possible catalyst materials. The model is based on calculations of adsorption energies using density functional theory. Thirty different elements were considered. Adsorption energies of intermediate molecules in the methane pyrolysis reaction correlate linearly with the adsorption energy of carbon. Moreover, the adsorption energy increases in magnitude with decreasing group number in the $d$-block of the periodic table. For a temperature range between 600 and 1200 K and a normalized partial pressure range for $\mathrm{H_2}$ between $10^{-1}$ and $10^{-5}$, a total of eighteen different materials were found to be optimal catalysts at least once. This indicates that catalyst selection and reactor operating conditions should be well-matched. The present work establishes the foundation for future large-scale studies of surfaces, alloy compositions, and material classes using machine learning algorithms.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: **How to find catalyst materials that can reduce the operating temperature of the methane pyrolysis reaction, so as to make methane pyrolysis economically feasible on an industrial scale**.
Specifically, methane pyrolysis is a technology with the potential to replace traditional hydrogen production methods because it can avoid greenhouse gas emissions. However, due to the high operating temperature limiting its economic feasibility, it is necessary to find a material that can effectively catalyze at a lower temperature. For this purpose, the researchers developed a model based on density functional theory (DFT) to calculate the adsorption energy for qualitatively comparing the performance of different catalyst materials.
The following are the main contents and conclusions of this study:
1. **Background and Problem Statement**:
- Hydrogen, as an important energy carrier and chemical raw material, has the potential to replace fossil fuels.
- Traditional hydrogen production depends on fossil fuels, resulting in a large amount of carbon dioxide emissions.
- Methane pyrolysis (i.e., decomposing methane into solid carbon and hydrogen under oxygen - free conditions) is a hydrogen - production method with zero CO2 emissions, but it requires high - temperature conditions (usually exceeding 1200°C), which makes industrial application challenging.
- Therefore, finding an efficient catalyst that can reduce the operating temperature becomes crucial.
2. **Model Establishment**:
- The researchers calculated the adsorption energy of 30 different elements by DFT and established the relationship between the adsorption energy and the reaction steps.
- The adsorption energy is linearly related to the carbon adsorption energy and increases as the group number of the d - block elements in the periodic table decreases.
- When the temperature ranges from 600 to 1200 K and the H2 partial pressure varies between 10^-1 and 10^-5, a total of 18 different materials were found to be the optimal catalysts at least once.
3. **Results and Discussion**:
- The selection of the best catalyst is closely related to the operating conditions of the reactor, indicating that the catalyst selection and operating conditions should be well - matched.
- For example, under the conditions of 1000 K, pCH4 = 0.99 and pH2 = 0.01, metals such as Rh, Ru, Y, Sc, Nb and W exhibit the best performance.
- Through volcano plot analysis, combined with market price information, an economically feasible choice can be made.
4. **Conclusion**:
- This study provides an effective model for evaluating the performance of different catalyst materials in methane pyrolysis.
- The results show that by appropriately selecting the catalyst and optimizing the operating conditions, the economy and efficiency of methane pyrolysis can be significantly improved.
- This model lays the foundation for future large - scale research on surfaces, alloy compositions and material categories, especially for further optimization using machine - learning algorithms.
In conclusion, this study aims to solve the key problem of catalyst selection in the methane pyrolysis process by developing a prediction model, thereby promoting this technology to move towards industrial application.