Mapping acceptance: micro scenarios as a dual-perspective approach for assessing public opinion and individual differences in technology perception

Philipp Brauner

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1419564

2024-10-17

Abstract:Understanding public perception of technology is crucial to aligning research, development, and governance of technology. This article introduces micro scenarios as an integrative method to evaluate mental models and social acceptance across numerous technologies and concepts using a few single-item scales within a single comprehensive survey. This approach contrasts with traditional methods that focus on detailed assessments of as few as one scenario. The data can be interpreted in two ways: Perspective (1): Average evaluations of each participant can be seen as individual differences, providing reflexive measurements across technologies or topics. This helps in understanding how perceptions of technology relate to other personality factors. Perspective (2): Average evaluations of each technology or topic can be interpreted as technology attributions. This makes it possible to position technologies on visuo-spatial maps to simplify identification of critical issues, conduct comparative rankings based on selected criteria, and to analyze the interplay between different attributions. This dual approach enables the modeling of acceptance-relevant factors that shape public opinion. It offers a framework for researchers, technology developers, and policymakers to identify pivotal factors for acceptance at both the individual and technology levels. I illustrate this methodology with examples from my research, provide practical guidelines, and include R code to enable others to conduct similar studies. This paper aims to bridge the gap between technological advancement and societal perception, offering a tool for more informed decision-making in technology development and policy-making.

Computers and Society

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the limitations of current technology acceptance evaluation methods. Specifically, traditional technology acceptance research usually focuses on the detailed evaluation of a single or a few technologies, which makes it difficult to conduct comparison and comprehensive analysis across multiple technologies. In addition, these traditional methods are difficult to provide a comprehensive perspective that can consider both individual differences and technology attributes simultaneously.

To make up for these deficiencies, this paper proposes a new "micro - scenarios" method. This method aims to quickly assess the public perception of a large number of different technologies and concepts through brief scenario descriptions and integrate these assessment results into a unified survey tool. Through this method, researchers can:

1. **Quantitatively compare multiple technologies**: Evaluate a wide range of technologies or concepts in one survey, thereby achieving quantitative comparison across technologies.
2. **Understand individual differences**: Not only evaluate public opinions from a technological perspective, but also understand people's views on different technologies from the perspective of individual differences.
3. **Visualize cognitive maps**: Map the assessment results onto a two - dimensional space map in order to more intuitively identify key issues, conduct comparison rankings, and analyze the interactions between different attributes.

Therefore, the core issue of this paper is to develop an efficient and comprehensive method to better understand the public's awareness and acceptance of multiple technologies and provide strong support for technology research and development, policy - making, etc.

### Formula Representation

No specific mathematical formulas are involved in the paper, but some statistical analysis methods are mentioned, such as linear regression analysis. For example, when studying the overall evaluation of medical technology, a linear regression model was used to analyze the influence of perceived risk and perceived utility on the overall evaluation:

\[
\text{Overall Valence} = \beta_0 + \beta_1 (\text{Perceived Risk}) + \beta_2 (\text{Perceived Utility})
\]

where:
- \(\beta_0\) is the intercept term
- \(\beta_1\) and \(\beta_2\) are the regression coefficients of perceived risk and perceived utility respectively

By calculating the regression coefficients and obtaining a high explained variance (> 90%), the author concludes that the overall evaluation of medical technology is mainly determined by perceived utility rather than perceived risk.