The Cadaver in the Machine: The Social Practices of Measurement and Validation in Motion Capture Technology

Emma Harvey,Hauke Sandhaus,Abigail Z. Jacobs,Emanuel Moss,Mona Sloane

2024-01-20

Abstract:Motion capture systems, used across various domains, make body representations concrete through technical processes. We argue that the measurement of bodies and the validation of measurements for motion capture systems can be understood as social practices. By analyzing the findings of a systematic literature review (N=278) through the lens of social practice theory, we show how these practices, and their varying attention to errors, become ingrained in motion capture design and innovation over time. Moreover, we show how contemporary motion capture systems perpetuate assumptions about human bodies and their movements. We suggest that social practices of measurement and validation are ubiquitous in the development of data- and sensor-driven systems more broadly, and provide this work as a basis for investigating hidden design assumptions and their potential negative consequences in human-computer interaction.

Computers and Society,Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition,Human-Computer Interaction

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The core issue explored in this paper is the social practice of measurement and validation in motion capture technology, and it analyzes the implicit assumptions about the human body within these practices and their potential social impacts.

The main contribution of the paper lies in its detailed historical case study of the assumptions established in motion capture technology, particularly those related to the measurement and validation processes. The authors apply social practice theory to analyze the historical development of measurement and validation practices in the design and innovation of motion capture technology, revealing how these practices have stabilized over time and how specific assumptions about the human body have been embedded in this process.

Specifically, the authors focus on the following points:
1. **Application of Social Practice Theory**: The authors use social practice theory as an analytical framework, focusing on how the social practices of measurement and validation have stabilized over time, space, and different contexts.
2. **Historical Analysis**: Through a systematic literature review, the authors analyze the history of motion capture design, measurement, and validation from the 1930s to the present.
3. **Types of Errors**: The authors find that different types of errors became focal points at different historical stages of motion capture technology, revealing the stable measurement practices of different periods.
4. **Validation Practices**: The paper also describes how validation practices have stabilized over time and how these measurement and validation practices encode assumptions that influence the fundamental functions of contemporary motion capture technology.

In summary, this paper provides an in-depth historical analysis of the social practices of measurement and validation in motion capture technology, revealing the inherent assumptions about the human body within these practices and exploring how these assumptions have stabilized over time, potentially leading to negative impacts.