Abstract:Background and Objective: Motion analysis is crucial for effective and timely rehabilitative interventions on people with motor disorders. Conventional marker-based (MB) gait analysis is highly time-consuming and calls for expensive equipment, dedicated facilities and personnel. Markerless (ML) systems may pave the way to less demanding gait monitoring, also in unsupervised environments (i.e., in telemedicine). However,scepticism on clinical usability of relevant outcome measures has hampered its use. ML is normally used to analyse treadmill walking, which is significantly different from the more physiological overground walking. This study aims to provide end-users with instructions on using a single-camera markerless system to obtain reliable motion data from overground walking, while clinicians will be instructed on the reliability of obtained quantities. Methods: The study compares kinematics obtained from ML systems to those concurrently obtained from marker-based systems, considering different stride counts and subject positioning within the capture volume. Results: The findings suggest that five straight walking trials are sufficient for collecting reliable kinematics with ML systems. Precision on joint kinematics decreased at the boundary of the capture volume. Excellent correlation was found between ML and MB systems for hip and knee angles ( 0.92 ), with slightly lower correlations observed for ankle plantar-dorsiflexion. The Bland–Altman analysis indicated the largest bias for hip flexion/extension ( [0.2∘,10.9∘] ) and the smallest for knee joint ( [0.1∘,0.8∘] ) when comparing MB-PiG and MB-JC approaches. For MB-JC vs. ML-JC comparison, the largest bias was for the ankle joint ( [1.2∘,11.8∘] ), while the smallest was for the hip joint ( [0.2∘,7.3∘] ). Conclusion: Single-camera markerless motion capture systems have great potential in assessing human joint kinematics during overground walking. Clinicians can confidently rely on estimated joint kinematics while walking, enabling personalized interventions and improving accessibility to remote evaluation and rehabilitation services, as long as: (i) the camera is positioned to capture someone walking back and forth at least five times with good visibility of the entire body silhouette; (ii) the walking path is at least 2 m long; and (iii) images captured at the boundaries of the camera image plane should be discarded.

Validation of Markerless Motion Capture for Soldier Movement Patterns Assessment Under Varying Body-Borne Loads

Markerless motion capture provides accurate predictions of ground reaction forces across a range of movement tasks

Markerless motion capture estimates of lower extremity kinematics and kinetics are comparable to marker-based across 8 movements

The Development and Evaluation of a Fully Automated Markerless Motion Capture Workflow

Agreement between a markerless and a marker-based motion capture systems for balance related quantities

Comparison of Concurrent and Asynchronous Running Kinematics and Kinetics From Marker-Based and Markerless Motion Capture Under Varying Clothing Conditions

Validation of a 3D Markerless Motion Capture Tool Using Multiple Pose and Depth Estimations for Quantitative Gait Analysis

Concurrent assessment of gait kinematics using marker-based and markerless motion capture

On the reliability of single-camera markerless systems for overground gait monitoring

Human gait assessment using a 3D marker-less multimodal motion capture system

The accuracy of markerless motion capture combined with computer vision techniques for measuring running kinematics

Validation of Automated Countermovement Vertical Jump Analysis: Markerless Pose Estimation vs. 3D Marker-Based Motion Capture System

Markerless vs. Marker-Based Gait Analysis: A Proof of Concept Study

Moving system with action sport cameras: 3D kinematics of the walking and running in a large volume

Biological reliability of a movement analysis assessment using a markerless motion capture system

Comparison of kinematics between Theia markerless and conventional marker-based gait analysis in clinical patients

Moving outside the lab: markerless motion capture accurately quantifies sagittal plane kinematics during the vertical jump

Validation of OpenCap: A low-cost markerless motion capture system for lower-extremity kinematics during return-to-sport tasks

Comparison of kinematics and joint moments calculations for lower limbs during gait using markerless and marker-based motion capture

OpenCap markerless motion capture estimation of lower extremity kinematics and dynamics in cycling

Smartphone videos-driven musculoskeletal multibody dynamics modelling workflow to estimate the lower limb joint contact forces and ground reaction forces