Abstract:Background and Objective: Motion analysis is crucial for effective and timely rehabilitative interventions on people with motor disorders. Conventional marker-based (MB) gait analysis is highly time-consuming and calls for expensive equipment, dedicated facilities and personnel. Markerless (ML) systems may pave the way to less demanding gait monitoring, also in unsupervised environments (i.e., in telemedicine). However,scepticism on clinical usability of relevant outcome measures has hampered its use. ML is normally used to analyse treadmill walking, which is significantly different from the more physiological overground walking. This study aims to provide end-users with instructions on using a single-camera markerless system to obtain reliable motion data from overground walking, while clinicians will be instructed on the reliability of obtained quantities. Methods: The study compares kinematics obtained from ML systems to those concurrently obtained from marker-based systems, considering different stride counts and subject positioning within the capture volume. Results: The findings suggest that five straight walking trials are sufficient for collecting reliable kinematics with ML systems. Precision on joint kinematics decreased at the boundary of the capture volume. Excellent correlation was found between ML and MB systems for hip and knee angles ( 0.92 ), with slightly lower correlations observed for ankle plantar-dorsiflexion. The Bland–Altman analysis indicated the largest bias for hip flexion/extension ( [0.2∘,10.9∘] ) and the smallest for knee joint ( [0.1∘,0.8∘] ) when comparing MB-PiG and MB-JC approaches. For MB-JC vs. ML-JC comparison, the largest bias was for the ankle joint ( [1.2∘,11.8∘] ), while the smallest was for the hip joint ( [0.2∘,7.3∘] ). Conclusion: Single-camera markerless motion capture systems have great potential in assessing human joint kinematics during overground walking. Clinicians can confidently rely on estimated joint kinematics while walking, enabling personalized interventions and improving accessibility to remote evaluation and rehabilitation services, as long as: (i) the camera is positioned to capture someone walking back and forth at least five times with good visibility of the entire body silhouette; (ii) the walking path is at least 2 m long; and (iii) images captured at the boundaries of the camera image plane should be discarded.

Comparison of kinematics between Theia markerless and conventional marker-based gait analysis in clinical patients

Concurrent assessment of gait kinematics using marker-based and markerless motion capture

Absolute Reliability of Gait Parameters Acquired With Markerless Motion Capture in Living Domains

The applicability of markerless motion capture for clinical gait analysis in children with cerebral palsy

Clinical reliability and validity of a video-based markerless gait evaluation method

Markerless motion capture estimates of lower extremity kinematics and kinetics are comparable to marker-based across 8 movements

Comparison of kinematics and joint moments calculations for lower limbs during gait using markerless and marker-based motion capture

On the reliability of single-camera markerless systems for overground gait monitoring

Markerless vs. Marker-Based Gait Analysis: A Proof of Concept Study

Accuracy, Validity, and Reliability of Markerless Camera-Based 3D Motion Capture Systems versus Marker-Based 3D Motion Capture Systems in Gait Analysis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Markerless three-dimensional gait analysis in healthy older adults: test-retest reliability and measurement error

Validation of a 3D Markerless Motion Capture Tool Using Multiple Pose and Depth Estimations for Quantitative Gait Analysis

Differences between lower extremity joint running kinetics captured by marker-based and markerless systems were speed dependent

Markerless gait analysis through a single camera and computer vision

Validation of a portable marker-based motion analysis system

Center of Mass Affect Joint Kinetics Estimated by Markerless and Marker-based Systems During Running

The accuracy of markerless motion capture combined with computer vision techniques for measuring running kinematics

Human gait assessment using a 3D marker-less multimodal motion capture system

Comparability between wearable inertial sensors and an electronic walkway for spatiotemporal and relative phase data in young children aged 6–11 years

Comparison of Lower Extremity Joint Moment and Power Estimated by Markerless and Marker-Based Systems during Treadmill Running

Agreement between a markerless and a marker-based motion capture systems for balance related quantities