Abstract:Individuals often preferentially avoid information that contradicts and seek information that aligns with their prior beliefs-a tendency referred to as "selective exposure." Traditionally, prior research has focused on intrapersonal drivers of selective exposure, including avoidance of cognitive dissonance. We take a complementary approach by investigating the conditions under which interpersonal concerns drive selective exposure. Drawing on a large literature on impression management, we test a social signaling model of selective exposure, which predicts that (a) individuals shift their information selection decisions to signal to observers and (b) observers reward such shifts. We test this model in the domain of partisan politics in the United States across five financially incentivized, preregistered experiments (N = 3,598). Our results extend prior theory by identifying three key contingencies: the type of task on which observers expect to collaborate with actors, alignment of group membership between observers and actors, and the magnitude of demonstrated selective exposure. Overall, we find that tailoring one's information selection decisions can indeed have strategic value-but only under certain theoretically predictable conditions. Our work also identifies an actor-observer misalignment: While observers are sensitive to the type of future interaction with an actor, the actors themselves do not intuit this sensitivity. In the era of social media, when information selection decisions are more public than ever and the spread of misinformation is pervasive, understanding the ways in which reputational considerations shape decision making not only illuminates why selective exposure persists, but also suggests novel mitigation strategies. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Exposure effects are not automatically useful for policymaking

Discussion of 'Causal inference with misspecified exposure mappings: separating definitions and assumptions'

Rejoinder: Causal inference with misspecified exposure mappings: separating definitions and assumptions

The contingent reputational benefits of selective exposure to partisan information.

The functional aspects of selective exposure for collective decision-making under social influence

The Relevance of Item-Co-Exposure For Exposure Bias Mitigation

Exposure variables in veterinary epidemiology: are they telling us what we think they are?

Risk preferences and risk perceptions in insurance experiments: some methodological challenges

Exposure science in an age of rapidly changing climate: challenges and opportunities

Identifying Optimal Methods for Addressing Confounding Bias When Estimating the Effects of State-Level Policies

Exposure range matters: considering non-linear associations in the meta-analysis of environmental pollutant exposure using examples of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances and birth outcomes

Mitigating Exposure Bias in Recommender Systems – A Comparative Analysis of Discrete Choice Models

The primary importance of the research question: Implications for understanding natural versus controlled direct effects and the 'cross-world independence assumption'

A Review of Causal Inference Methods for Estimating the Effects of Exposure Change when Incident Exposure Is Unobservable

Public attitudes towards social media field experiments

Generalization Issues in Experiments Involving Multidimensional Decisions

Why is exposure to opposing views aversive? Reconciling three theoretical perspectives

Measurement Error and Environmental Epidemiology: a Policy Perspective

Tantalus on the Road to Asymptopia

Environmental Exposure Mixtures: Questions and Methods to Address Them