Abstract:Opinion diversity is crucial for collective decision-making, but maintaining it becomes challenging in the face of social influence. We propose selective exposure as an endogenous mechanism that preserves opinion diversity by forming exclusive subgroups of like-minded individuals, or echo chambers, which have been often perceived as an obstacle to achieving collective intelligence. We consider situations where a group of agents collectively make decisions about the true state of nature with the assumption that agents update their opinions by adopting the aggregated opinions of their information sources (i.e., naïve learning), or alternatively, replace incongruent sources with more like-minded others without adjusting their opinions (i.e., selective exposure). Individual opinions at steady states reached under these dynamics are then aggregated to form collective decisions, and their quality is assessed. The results suggest that the diversity-reducing effects of social influence are effectively confined within subgroups formed by selective exposure. More importantly, strong propensities for selective exposure maintain the quality of collective decisions at a level as high as that achieved in the absence of social influence. In contrast, naïve learning allows groups to reach consensuses, which are more accurate than initial individual opinions, but significantly undermines the quality of collective decisions.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper attempts to address the issue of how to maintain opinion diversity in collective decision-making under social influence. Specifically, the authors explore how selective exposure, as an endogenous mechanism, can effectively limit the negative impact of social influence on opinion diversity while forming exclusive subgroups (or echo chambers), thereby maintaining the quality of collective decision-making. ### Background 1. **Importance of Opinion Diversity**: Opinion diversity is crucial for collective decision-making as it ensures a variety of opinions within the group. 2. **Challenges of Social Influence**: Social influence reduces opinion diversity, leading to convergence of opinions among group members, which affects the quality of collective decision-making. ### Research Questions 1. **How to Maintain Opinion Diversity under Social Influence**: The authors propose selective exposure as a potential solution. 2. **Effectiveness of Selective Exposure**: The study examines whether selective exposure can maintain opinion diversity while sustaining or even improving the quality of collective decision-making. ### Main Findings 1. **Effectiveness of Selective Exposure**: - Selective exposure promotes the formation of exclusive subgroups, where opinions within these subgroups tend to converge, but opinions between different subgroups remain diverse. - A strong tendency for selective exposure can maintain opinion diversity on a global level, thereby sustaining the quality of collective decision-making. 2. **Comparison with Simple Aggregation**: - The quality of collective decision-making under selective exposure can reach levels comparable to those without social influence. - In contrast, naive learning, while enabling the group to reach a consensus, often results in less accurate consensus compared to the simple aggregation of initial individual opinions, especially when considering the marginal improvement of collective accuracy with group size. ### Conclusion Selective exposure, by forming exclusive subgroups, effectively limits the negative impact of social influence on opinion diversity, thereby maintaining the quality of collective decision-making while preserving opinion diversity. This finding challenges the previous view that selective exposure is an obstacle to collective intelligence and emphasizes the importance of opinion diversity in collective decision-making.

The functional aspects of selective exposure for collective decision-making under social influence

The Influence of Superordinate Identity on Group Decision Making Through Discussion

The contingent reputational benefits of selective exposure to partisan information.

Biased processing and opinion polarization: experimental refinement of argument communication theory in the context of the energy debate

Social Influence and the Collective Dynamics of Opinion Formation

Social Influence Undermines the Wisdom of the Crowd in Sequential Decision Making

Collective decision-making under changing social environments among agents adapted to sparse connectivity

Disentangling the Echo Chamber: How Exposure to Congruent and Incongruent Opinion Climates on Social Networking Sites Impacts Users’ Processing and Selection of Information

Maximizing diversity and persuasiveness of opinion articles in social networks

Modeling confirmation bias and peer pressure in opinion dynamics

Opinion Formation Analysis for Expressed and Private Opinions (epos) Models: Reasoning Private Opinions from Behaviors in Group Decision-Making Systems

Cross-inhibition leads to group consensus despite the presence of strongly opinionated minorities and asocial behaviour

A Cognitive Computational Approach to Social and Collective Decision-Making

Agents seeking long-term access to the wisdom of the crowd reduce immediate decision-making accuracy

Intergroup Competition Mitigates Effects of Reward Structure on Preference-Consistency Bias and Group Decision Failure

Selective exposure in different political information environments – How media fragmentation and polarization shape congruent news use

Opinion Dynamics and Collective Decisions

How heterogeneous social influence acts on human decision-making in online social networks

The impact of diversity on group decision-making in the face of the free-rider problem

A Consensus Model with Non-Cooperative Behavior Adaptive Management Based on Cognitive Psychological State Computation in Large-Scale Group Decision