Abstract:This paper examines the effect of an industrial policy in China named the VAT export tax on product upgrading. In particular, we use Chinese transaction data during 2003–2010 to isolate the causal impact of the exogenous variation of VAT refund and within the city‐product quality change in HS6 exported products. Our identification strategy entails the utilization of duality of the Chinese trade system to isolate the impact of the rebate by comparing a group of trade flows exempt from the refund and another that remains eligible. Our results suggest an increase in product upgrading in response to an increase in VAT refund. In this study, we also introduce the credit constraint to understand the change in quality. The industries that are confronted with tighter credit constraints impel firms to settle for low‐quality products. The model demonstrates that VAT refund provided a counterbalance force to credit constraints, thereby prompting firms to adjust quality. By increasing the refund granted to ordinary traders, firms leverage this excess cash flow to invest (in a fixed asset or innovative project) and improve the quality of products. This effect is reinforced for products exported to developed countries, heterogeneous products, or from larger industries. The Chinese policymakers formally introduced environmental objectives under the 10th and 11th FYP, respectively. The Party leaders put substantial weight on promoting products embedded with high‐added value or technological content. At the same time, they underscored the willingness to downscale the export share of energy‐intensive or polluting industries. We evaluate whether environmental and economic concern impacts product upgrading. According to the results of this study, the VAT refund is effective only for products produced in "cleaner" industries, for products necessitating technical skills, a range of know‐how in manufacturing, and high‐level technology or engaging in research and development activities. Our paper introduces a new and unexplored variable in the trade literature. We use the stock of non‐trade barriers to explicate the change in product quality. In the import market, Chinese exporters comply with the change in regulation by making upward adjustments in the quality.

Export to elude

Value-Added Tax and Corporate Tax Burden: Evidence from China’s Value-Added Tax Rate Reform

Asymmetric Reform Bonus: the Impact of VAT Pilot Expansion on China's Corporate Total Tax Burden

Do VAT cuts help stabilize employment? Evidence from China’s VAT rate reform

VAT rebates and export performance in China: Firm-level evidence

Evading by Any Means? VAT Enforcement and Payroll Tax Evasion in China

Taxing the Online Haven: Impacts of the EU VAT Reform on Cross-Border E-Commerce

How Does the Substitution of VAT for GRT Affect Outsourcing Behavior and Production Efficiency? Evidence from China

The “matthew Effect” in Rebates: How Does VAT Rebates Allocation Affect Firm Export Performance

The impact of export VAT rebate reduction on firms'pollution emissions: Evidence from Chinese enterprises

VAT Adoption and Corporate Income Tax Avoidance

Trade and Welfare Effects of Export Tax: Theory and Evidence from China's Incomplete Export VAT Rebate

Export Tax Rebate and the Margins of Exports: Product-Level Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment

Value‐added export tax policy, credit constraints, and quality: Evidence from China

Exporters' Environmental Premium in a Developing Country: Firm‐level Evidence from China

Do Export Tax Rebates Promote Firm Upgrading? Evidences from Labor-Intensive Firms in China

Effective VAT Rates, Tax Efficiency and Burden: Are Some Industries over-Taxed in China?

VAT credit refunds and firm productivity: Evidence from China's VAT reform

VAT Reform,Capital Market Segmentation and the Quality of Exports——Evidence from Chinese Manufacturing Enterprises

Does tax deduction relax financing constraints? Evidence from China's value-added tax reform

Behavioural Additionality of China’s Business-Tax-to-vat Reform on Firms’ Internal and External R&D Investment