Abstract:This paper examines the effect of an industrial policy in China named the VAT export tax on product upgrading. In particular, we use Chinese transaction data during 2003–2010 to isolate the causal impact of the exogenous variation of VAT refund and within the city‐product quality change in HS6 exported products. Our identification strategy entails the utilization of duality of the Chinese trade system to isolate the impact of the rebate by comparing a group of trade flows exempt from the refund and another that remains eligible. Our results suggest an increase in product upgrading in response to an increase in VAT refund. In this study, we also introduce the credit constraint to understand the change in quality. The industries that are confronted with tighter credit constraints impel firms to settle for low‐quality products. The model demonstrates that VAT refund provided a counterbalance force to credit constraints, thereby prompting firms to adjust quality. By increasing the refund granted to ordinary traders, firms leverage this excess cash flow to invest (in a fixed asset or innovative project) and improve the quality of products. This effect is reinforced for products exported to developed countries, heterogeneous products, or from larger industries. The Chinese policymakers formally introduced environmental objectives under the 10th and 11th FYP, respectively. The Party leaders put substantial weight on promoting products embedded with high‐added value or technological content. At the same time, they underscored the willingness to downscale the export share of energy‐intensive or polluting industries. We evaluate whether environmental and economic concern impacts product upgrading. According to the results of this study, the VAT refund is effective only for products produced in "cleaner" industries, for products necessitating technical skills, a range of know‐how in manufacturing, and high‐level technology or engaging in research and development activities. Our paper introduces a new and unexplored variable in the trade literature. We use the stock of non‐trade barriers to explicate the change in product quality. In the import market, Chinese exporters comply with the change in regulation by making upward adjustments in the quality.

Export Tax Rebate and the Margins of Exports: Product-Level Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment

VAT rebates and export performance in China: Firm-level evidence

The “matthew Effect” in Rebates: How Does VAT Rebates Allocation Affect Firm Export Performance

Value-Added Tax and Corporate Tax Burden: Evidence from China’s Value-Added Tax Rate Reform

Do VAT cuts help stabilize employment? Evidence from China’s VAT rate reform

Trade and Welfare Effects of Export Tax: Theory and Evidence from China's Incomplete Export VAT Rebate

The impact of export VAT rebate reduction on firms'pollution emissions: Evidence from Chinese enterprises

Export to elude

Value‐added export tax policy, credit constraints, and quality: Evidence from China

Regional Effects of Export Tax Rebate on Exporting Firms: Evidence from China

Asymmetric Reform Bonus: the Impact of VAT Pilot Expansion on China's Corporate Total Tax Burden

An Empirical Analysis on Value-added Tax Shifting of Export Products in China： Based on Changes of Export Rebate Policies

Trade Diversion effects of China`s Vat Export Rebates

Do Export Tax Rebates Promote Firm Upgrading? Evidences from Labor-Intensive Firms in China

The Effect of Tax Rebate Policy Changes on China's Exports:An Empirical Analysis

The effect of export tax rebates on export performance: Theory and evidence from China

Output Fluctuations,Demand Transfer and Export Tax Rebate Incentive Effects:An Empirical Study based on China′s Export Panel Data

Unintended consequences of tax incentives on export product quality: Evidence from a natural experiment in China

Markets and Markups: A New Empirical Framework and Evidence on Exporters from China

Tax Rebates and Employment: an Empirical VAR Analysis of China’s Industrial Panel Data

The unintended energy efficiency gain from tax incentives for investment: Micro‐evidence from quasi‐natural experiments in China