Abstract:Background: Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is a complex 3-dimensional (3D) hip abnormality that can cause hip pain and osteoarthritis in young and active patients of childbearing age. Imaging is static and based on 2-dimensional radiographs or computed tomography (CT) scans. Recently, CT-based 3D impingement simulation was introduced for patient-specific assessments of hip deformities, whereas magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) offers a radiation-free alternative for surgical planning before hip arthroscopic surgery. Purpose: To (1) investigate the difference between 3D models of the hip, (2) correlate the location of hip impingement and range of motion (ROM), and (3) correlate diagnostic parameters while comparing CT- and MRI-based osseous 3D models of the hip in symptomatic patients with FAI. Study Design: Cohort study (Diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2. Methods: The authors performed an institutional review board-approved comparative and retrospective study of 31 hips in 26 symptomatic patients with FAI. We compared CT- and MRI-based osseous 3D models of the hip in the same patients. 3D CT scans (slice thickness, 1 mm) of the entire pelvis and the distal femoral condyles were obtained. Preoperative MRI of the hip was performed including an axial-oblique T1 VIBE sequence (slice thickness, 1 mm) and 2 axial anisotropic (1.2 x 1.2 x 1 mm) T1 VIBE Dixon sequences of the entire pelvis and the distal femoral condyles. Threshold-based semiautomatic reconstruction of 3D models was performed using commercial software. CT- and MRI-based 3D models were compared with specifically developed software. Results: (1) The difference between MRI- and CT-based 3D models was less than 1 mm for the proximal femur and the acetabulum (median surface distance, 0.4 +/- 0.1 mm and 0.4 +/- 0.2 mm, respectively). (2) The correlation for ROM values was excellent (r = 0.99, P < .001) between CT and MRI. The mean absolute difference for flexion and extension was 1.9 degrees +/- 1.5 degrees and 2.6 degrees +/- 1.9 degrees, respectively. The location of impingement did not differ between CT- and MRI-based 3D ROM analysis in all 12 of 12 acetabular and 11 of 12 femoral clock-face positions. (3) The correlation for 6 diagnostic parameters was excellent (r = 0.98, P < .001) between CT and MRI. The mean absolute difference for inclination and anteversion was 2.0 degrees +/- 1.8 degrees and 1.0 degrees +/- 0.8 degrees, respectively. Conclusion: Patient-specific and radiation-free MRI-based dynamic 3D simulation of hip impingement and ROM can replace CT-based 3D simulation for patients with FAI of childbearing age. On the basis of these excellent results, we intend to change our clinical practice, and we will use MRI-based 3D models for future clinical practice instead of CT-based 3D models. This allows radiation-free and patient-specific preoperative 3D impingement simulation for surgical planning and simulation of open hip preservation surgery and hip arthroscopic surgery.

Use of robotic technology in cam femoroacetabular impingement corrective surgery

Computer-Assisted Arthroscopic Cam Resection

Arthroscopic Femoral Osteoplasty for Cam-Type Femoroacetabular Impingement

Cam-Type Impingement: Ensuring an Ideal Femoroplasty

Improved accuracy of a novel fluoroscopy-based robotically assisted THA system compared to manual THA

Improved accuracy and fewer outliers with a novel CT-free robotic THA system in matched-pair analysis with manual THA

Precise Acetabular Prosthesis Positioning Using a Novel Robot‐Assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty System: A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial

Femoral Head-Neck Ratio in Patients with Cam-type Femoroacetabular Impingement and Healthy Adults and Its Impact on Surgical Strategy

Total Hip Arthroplasty with Robotic Arm Assistance for Precise Cup Positioning: A Case-Control Study

Automated volumetric and statistical shape assessment of cam-type morphology of the femoral head-neck region from 3D magnetic resonance images

Use of Robotic‐Arm Assisted Technique in Complex Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

The LANCET robotic system can improve surgical efficiency in total hip arthroplasty: A prospective randomized, multicenter, parallel-controlled clinical trial

Computer Assisted Planning and Navigation of Periacetabular Osteotomy with Range of Motion Optimization

Does robotic-assisted computer navigation improve acetabular cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty for Crowe III/IV hip dysplasia? A propensity score case-match analysis

A Surgical Robotic System for Treatment of Pelvic Osteolysis Using an FBG-Equipped Continuum Manipulator and Flexible Instruments

Robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty utilizing a fluoroscopy-guided system produced similar cup accuracy and precision relative to a computerized tomography-based robotic platform

A multicentre prospective assessment of the utility of robotic assisted total hip arthroplasty with virtual range of motion on intraoperative implant positioning

Patient-Specific 3-D Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Dynamic Simulation Of Hip Impingement And Range Of Motion Can Replace 3-D Computed Tomography-Based Simulation For Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement: Implications For Planning Open Hip Preservation Surgery And Hip Arthroscopy

Extent of Cam Resection Relative to Epiphyseal Line and Its Association with Clinical Outcomes after Arthroscopic Treatment for Femoroacetabular Syndrome

Kinematic-kinetic compliant acetabular cup positioning based on preoperative motion tracking and musculoskeletal modeling for total hip arthroplasty

Intraoperative Technology Use Improves Accuracy of Functional Safe Zone Targeting in Total Hip Arthroplasty