Abstract:BackgroundImproper acetabular component orientation in THA has been associated with increased dislocation rates, component impingement, bearing surface wear, and a greater likelihood of revision. Therefore, any reasonable steps to improve acetabular component orientation should be considered and explored.Questions/purposesWe therefore sought to compare THA with a robotic-assisted posterior approach with manual alignment techniques through a posterior approach, using a matched-pair controlled study design, to assess whether the use of the robot made it more likely for the acetabular cup to be positioned in the safe zones described by Lewinnek et al. and Callanan et al.MethodsBetween September 2008 and September 2012, 160 THAs were performed by the senior surgeon. Sixty-two patients (38.8%) underwent THA using a conventional posterior approach, 69 (43.1%) underwent robotic-assisted THA using the posterior approach, and 29 (18.1%) underwent radiographic-guided anterior-approach THAs. From September 2008 to June 2011, all patients were offered anterior or posterior approaches regardless of BMI and anatomy. Since introduction of the robot in June 2011, all THAs were performed using the robotic technique through the posterior approach, unless a patient specifically requested otherwise. The radiographic cup positioning of the robotic-assisted THAs was compared with a matched-pair control group of conventional THAs performed by the same surgeon through the same posterior approach. The safe zone (inclination, 30°–50°; anteversion, 5°–25°) described by Lewinnek et al. and the modified safe zone (inclination, 30°–45°; anteversion, 5°–25°) of Callanan et al. were used for cup placement assessment. Matching criteria were gender, age ± 5 years, and (BMI) ± 7 units. After exclusions, a total of 50 THAs were included in each group. Strong interobserver and intraobserver correlations were found for all radiographic measurements (r > 0.82; p < 0.001).ResultsOne hundred percent (50/50) of the robotic-assisted THAs were within the safe zone described by Lewinnek et al. compared with 80% (40/50) of the conventional THAs (p = 0.001). Ninety-two percent (46/50) of robotic-assisted THAs were within the modified safe zone described by Callanan et al. compared with 62% (31/50) of conventional THAs p (p = 0.001). The odds ratios for an implanted cup out of the safe zones of Lewinnek et al. and Callanan et al. were zero and 0.142, respectively (95% CI, 0.044, 0.457).ConclusionsUse of the robot allowed for improvement in placement of the cup in both safe zones, an important parameter that plays a significant role in long-term success of THA. However, whether the radiographic improvements we observed will translate into clinical benefits for patients—such as reductions in component impingement, acetabular wear, and prosthetic dislocations, or in terms of improved longevity—remains unproven.Level of EvidenceLevel III, therapeutic study. See the Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Adult respiratory distress syndrome secondary to tularemia pneumonia.

Quantification of soft tissue artifacts using CT registration and subject-specific multibody modeling

A multicentre prospective assessment of the utility of robotic assisted total hip arthroplasty with virtual range of motion on intraoperative implant positioning

Synthesis of (+/-)-Gymnomitrol. Mn(OAc)(3)-Initiated Free-Radical Cyclization of Alkynyl Ketones.

Precise Acetabular Prosthesis Positioning Using a Novel Robot‐Assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty System: A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial

Intraoperative Technology Use Improves Accuracy of Functional Safe Zone Targeting in Total Hip Arthroplasty

Development and evaluation of an image-free computer-assisted impingement detection technique for total hip arthroplasty

Estimation Of The Relative Pose Of The Femoral And Acetabular Components In A Visual Aided System For Total Hip Replacement Surgeries

Accuracy of cup placement in total hip arthroplasty by means of a mechanical positioning device: a comprehensive cadaveric 3d analysis of 16 specimens

Improved accuracy and fewer outliers with a novel CT-free robotic THA system in matched-pair analysis with manual THA

Novel total hip surgery robotic system based on self-localization and optical measurement

Robotic arm-assisted total hip arthroplasty via a minimally invasive anterolateral approach in the supine position improves the precision of cup placement in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip

Undetected Intraoperative Pelvic Movement Can Lead to Inaccurate Acetabular Cup Component Placement during Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Mathematical Simulation Estimating Change in Cup Position

Myocardial Viability Testing and the Effect of Early Intervention in Patients With Advanced Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction

Cardiovascular diseases: Periostin regenerates broken heart

DEIT-Based Bone Position and Orientation Estimation for Robotic Support in Total Knee Arthroplasty-A Computational Feasibility Study

Smart Trail with Camera and Inertial Measurement Unit for Intraoperative Estimation of Hip Range of Motion in Total Hip Replacement Surgery.

Distributed Sum-Rate Optimization for Full-Duplex MIMO System Under Limited Dynamic Range

Comparison of Robotic-assisted and Conventional Acetabular Cup Placement in THA: A Matched-pair Controlled Study

Monitoring Hip Posture in Total Hip Arthroplasty Using an Inertial Measurement Unit-Based Hip Smart Trial System: an in Vitro Validation Experiment Using a Fixed Pelvis Model.

Conversion of the Sagittal Functional Safe Zone to the Coronal Plane Using a Mathematical Algorithm: The Reason for Failure of the Lewinnek Safe Zone