Abstract:We read with great interest the publication by Schallmo et al., [1] ‘Clinical presentation, imaging findings and arthroscopic features in skeletally immature and mature adolescent hip patients: a comparative double-cohort retrospective study’. The authors assessed the differences in clinical presentation and extent of surgery required based on skeletal maturity between two cohorts of the adolescent at the time of arthroscopic femoroacetabular impingement correction. The authors concluded that skeletal immaturity in hips would be associated with a lower frequency of pincer impingement and a decreased need for surgical acetabuloplasty. Generally speaking, this study is very important and interesting. However, some aspects still need to be further improved. All patients underwent plain-film radiographic and MRI scans without computed tomography (CT) scans. Actually, three-dimension CT (3D-CT) scans of the pelvis (and distal femur for assessment of femoral version) as part of clinical assessment and preoperative surgical planning could be used to fully define the location and size of femoral and acetabular deformity. The alpha angle could also be measured circumferentially around the femoral head-neck according to the clock-face methods [2]. A comprehensive preoperative evaluation is helpful for the surgeon to thoroughly deal with the bone deformity during the operation. Furthermore, it is also meaningful to evaluate the classification of the anterior inferior iliac spine (AIIS) between two cohorts of adolescent patients. Recently, AIIS deformity as an extra-articular source for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is concerned increasingly [3]. We note that the shortcomings of the Risser grading system were discussed by the authors. We agree with the authors that the Risser stage should be used in conjunction with other tools such as skeletal age, chronologic age and time since menarche in females to gauge skeletal maturity, particularly growth potential [4]. Regarding growth and development of the proximal femur, we know that the closure of the physes is initiated at ages 16–18 years, with 88% fusion at age 17–18 years and 100% fusion at age 20 years [5]. In clinic, concerns should be raised that performing femoral osteoplasty for the treatment of a symptomatic cam lesion in the skeletally immature (with open proximal femoral growth plate) patient would result in an additional damage to the physis, growth disturbance after hip arthroscopy. Therefore, the status of the physis (i.e. open vs. closed) should be determined in MRI images and during arthroscopic surgery. Carter et al., [5] found that patients with closed growth plates had a larger distance between the cam lesion and the physeal scar than those with open growth plates. We suggest that the author conduct such research and comparison between two cohorts of adolescent patients. Obtained the date of the distance between the cam lesion and the growth plate will help us further understand an etiological link between the two. Finally, it is interesting to find that there was a preponderance of females included in this study (80.5% in skeletally immature group and 63.3% in skeletally mature group) [1], although the typical individual affected by cam-type FAI is a young male. Again, this suggests that this study population may not have entirely represented the overall patient population of adolescent patients with FAI We respect the great contributions of the authors and would also be very much interested in the authors’ response to these issues. Acknowledgements This study is support by Shenzhen Second People’s Hospital Clinical Research Project (20193357019). Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest.

Pre-Operative Gait Kinematics and Kinetics Do Not Change Following Surgery in Adolescent Patients with Femoroacetabular Impingement

Hip and Pelvis Movement Patterns in Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome Differ From Controls and Change After Hip Arthroscopy During a Step-Down Pivot-Turn Task

Hip joint biomechanics during gait in people with and without symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement

Running Alterations Pre- and Postarthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome and Labral Tears

Does Preoperative Activity Level Affect Postoperative Clinical Outcomes Following Hip Arthroscopy in Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome (FAIS) Patients?

Arthroscopic Treatment for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome in Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Comparative analysis of hip arthroscopy and open surgical dislocation for treating femoroacetabular impingement

Differences in Kinematic Changes From Self-Selected to Fast Speed Gait in Asymptomatic Adults With Radiological Signs of Femoro-Acetabular Impingement

Postoperative weight-bearing restrictions and rehabilitation protocols after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement: a systematic review

Femoroacetabular impingement – What the rheumatologist needs to know

Pre- and intraoperative decision-making challenges in hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement

Joint Loading in the Sagittal Plane During Gait Is Associated With Hip Joint Abnormalities in Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement

Effect of Spinopelvic Parameters on Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome

Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement: Proceed with Caution

Association of Changes in Hip and Knee Kinematics During a Single-Leg Squat With Changes in Patient-Reported Outcomes at 6 Months and 1 Year After Hip Arthroscopy

Letter Regarding 'clinical Presentation, Imaging Findings and Arthroscopic Features in Skeletally Immature and Mature Adolescent Hip Patients: a Comparative Double-Cohort Retrospective Study'.

The Effect of Pelvic Incidence on Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement and Acetabular Labral Tears

Intermediate-Term Outcomes of Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome in Patients With Global Versus Isolated Lateral Acetabular Overcoverage

[Mid-Term Effectiveness of Arthroscopic Surgery for Femoroacetabular Impingement].

Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome Shows Good Outcomes and Low Revision Rates, with Young Age and Low Postoperative Pain Score Predicting Excellent 5-Year Outcomes

Squatting biomechanics following physiotherapist-led care or hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: a secondary analysis from a randomised controlled trial