Abstract:We investigate the issue in determining the significance of candidate transient gravitational-wave events in a ground-based interferometer network. Given the presence of non-Gaussian noise artefacts in real data, the noise background must be estimated empirically from the data itself. However, the data also potentially contains signals, thus the background estimate may be overstated due to contributions from signals. It has been proposed to mitigate possible bias by removing single-detector data samples that pass a multi-detector consistency test from the background estimates. We conduct a high-statistics Mock Data Challenge to evaluate the effects of removing such samples, modelling a range of scenarios with plausible detector noise distributions and with a range of plausible foreground astrophysical signal rates. We consider the two different modes: one in which coincident samples are removed, and one in which all samples are retained and used. Three algorithms were operated in both modes, show good consistency with each other; however, discrepancies arise between the results obtained under the "coincidence removal" and "all samples" modes, for false alarm probabilities below a certain value. In most scenarios the median of the false alarm probability (FAP) estimator under the "all samples" mode is consistent with the exact FAP. On the other hand the "coincidence removal" mode is found to be unbiased for the mean of the estimated FAP. While the numerical values at which discrepancies become apparent are specific to the details of our experiment, we believe that the qualitative differences in the behaviour of the median and mean of the FAP estimator have more general validity. On the basis of our study we suggest that the FAP of candidates for the first detection of gravitational waves should be estimated without removing single-detector samples that form coincidences.

Likelihood for a Network of Gravitational-Wave Detectors with Correlated Noise

Variational inference for correlated gravitational wave detector network noise

The Potential Impact of Noise Correlation in Next-generation Gravitational Wave Detectors

Correlated 0.01Hz-40Hz seismic and Newtonian noise and its impact on future gravitational-wave detectors

Prospects for an isotropic gravitational wave background detection with Earth-based interferometric detectors and the threat of correlated noise

Gravitational-wave geodesy: Defining false alarm probabilities with respect to correlated noise

Distinguishing a stochastic gravitational-wave signal from correlated noise with joint parameter estimation: Fisher analysis for ground-based detectors

Detecting a stochastic gravitational-wave background in the presence of correlated magnetic noise

On the (In)Efficiency of the Cross-Correlation Statistic for Gravitational Wave Stochastic Background Signals with Non-Gaussian Noise and Heterogeneous Detector Sensitivities

Confusion noise from astrophysical backgrounds at third-generation gravitational-wave detector networks

Posterior predictive checking for gravitational-wave detection with pulsar timing arrays: I. The optimal statistic

Detection in coincidence of gravitational wave bursts with a network of interferometric detectors (I): Geometric acceptance and timing

Data analysis strategies for the detection of gravitational waves in non-Gaussian noise

Parameter estimation with non stationary noise in gravitational waves data

Graviton Noise Correlation in Nearby Detectors

Toward robust detections of nanohertz gravitational waves

Noise spectral estimation methods and their impact on gravitational wave measurement of compact binary mergers

Next-generation global gravitational-wave detector network: Impact of detector orientation on compact binary coalescence and stochastic gravitational-wave background searches

Gravitational-Wave Parameter Estimation in non-Gaussian noise using Score-Based Likelihood Characterization

Systematic errors in estimation of gravitational-wave candidate significance

Growing Pains: Understanding the Impact of Likelihood Uncertainty on Hierarchical Bayesian Inference for Gravitational-Wave Astronomy