Abstract:We investigate the issue in determining the significance of candidate transient gravitational-wave events in a ground-based interferometer network. Given the presence of non-Gaussian noise artefacts in real data, the noise background must be estimated empirically from the data itself. However, the data also potentially contains signals, thus the background estimate may be overstated due to contributions from signals. It has been proposed to mitigate possible bias by removing single-detector data samples that pass a multi-detector consistency test from the background estimates. We conduct a high-statistics Mock Data Challenge to evaluate the effects of removing such samples, modelling a range of scenarios with plausible detector noise distributions and with a range of plausible foreground astrophysical signal rates. We consider the two different modes: one in which coincident samples are removed, and one in which all samples are retained and used. Three algorithms were operated in both modes, show good consistency with each other; however, discrepancies arise between the results obtained under the "coincidence removal" and "all samples" modes, for false alarm probabilities below a certain value. In most scenarios the median of the false alarm probability (FAP) estimator under the "all samples" mode is consistent with the exact FAP. On the other hand the "coincidence removal" mode is found to be unbiased for the mean of the estimated FAP. While the numerical values at which discrepancies become apparent are specific to the details of our experiment, we believe that the qualitative differences in the behaviour of the median and mean of the FAP estimator have more general validity. On the basis of our study we suggest that the FAP of candidates for the first detection of gravitational waves should be estimated without removing single-detector samples that form coincidences.

Gravitational-wave geodesy: Defining false alarm probabilities with respect to correlated noise

Gravitational-Wave Geodesy: A New Tool for Validating Detection of the Stochastic Gravitational-Wave Background

Calibrating signal-to-noise ratio detection thresholds using gravitational-wave catalogs

On the (In)Efficiency of the Cross-Correlation Statistic for Gravitational Wave Stochastic Background Signals with Non-Gaussian Noise and Heterogeneous Detector Sensitivities

Systematic errors in estimation of gravitational-wave candidate significance

Detecting a stochastic gravitational-wave background in the presence of correlated magnetic noise

Observational implications of lowering the LIGO-Virgo alert threshold

Possible Causes of False General Relativity Violations in Gravitational Wave Observations

Correlated 0.01Hz-40Hz seismic and Newtonian noise and its impact on future gravitational-wave detectors

The Potential Impact of Noise Correlation in Next-generation Gravitational Wave Detectors

Reducing False Alarms in Searches for Gravitational Waves from Coalescing Binary Systems

Impact of noise transients on gravitational-wave burst detection efficiency of the BayesWave pipeline with multidetector networks

Variational inference for correlated gravitational wave detector network noise

Distinguishing a stochastic gravitational-wave signal from correlated noise with joint parameter estimation: Fisher analysis for ground-based detectors

Measuring violations of General Relativity from single gravitational wave detection by non-spinning binary systems: higher-order asymptotic analysis

On the Potential Observation of False Deviations from General Relativity in Gravitational Wave Observations from Binary Black Holes

Posterior predictive checking for gravitational-wave detection with pulsar timing arrays: I. The optimal statistic

Prospects for an isotropic gravitational wave background detection with Earth-based interferometric detectors and the threat of correlated noise

Toward robust detections of nanohertz gravitational waves

Impact of noise transients on gravitational-wave burst detection efficiency of the BayesWave pipeline with multi-detector networks