Abstract:We investigate the issue in determining the significance of candidate transient gravitational-wave events in a ground-based interferometer network. Given the presence of non-Gaussian noise artefacts in real data, the noise background must be estimated empirically from the data itself. However, the data also potentially contains signals, thus the background estimate may be overstated due to contributions from signals. It has been proposed to mitigate possible bias by removing single-detector data samples that pass a multi-detector consistency test from the background estimates. We conduct a high-statistics Mock Data Challenge to evaluate the effects of removing such samples, modelling a range of scenarios with plausible detector noise distributions and with a range of plausible foreground astrophysical signal rates. We consider the two different modes: one in which coincident samples are removed, and one in which all samples are retained and used. Three algorithms were operated in both modes, show good consistency with each other; however, discrepancies arise between the results obtained under the "coincidence removal" and "all samples" modes, for false alarm probabilities below a certain value. In most scenarios the median of the false alarm probability (FAP) estimator under the "all samples" mode is consistent with the exact FAP. On the other hand the "coincidence removal" mode is found to be unbiased for the mean of the estimated FAP. While the numerical values at which discrepancies become apparent are specific to the details of our experiment, we believe that the qualitative differences in the behaviour of the median and mean of the FAP estimator have more general validity. On the basis of our study we suggest that the FAP of candidates for the first detection of gravitational waves should be estimated without removing single-detector samples that form coincidences.

Impact of noise transients on gravitational-wave burst detection efficiency of the BayesWave pipeline with multidetector networks

Impact of noise transients on gravitational-wave burst detection efficiency of the BayesWave pipeline with multi-detector networks

Characterizing the efficacy of methods to subtract terrestrial transient noise near gravitational wave events and the effects on parameter estimation

Assessing and Mitigating the Impact of Glitches on Gravitational-Wave Parameter Estimation: a Model Agnostic Approach

Gravitational-wave geodesy: Defining false alarm probabilities with respect to correlated noise

Unmasking noise transients masquerading as intermediate-mass black hole binaries

Mitigating the impact of noise transients in gravitational-wave searches using reduced basis timeseries and convolutional neural networks

Searching for gravitational-wave bursts with space-borne detectors

An autoencoder neural network integrated into gravitational-wave burst searches to improve the rejection of noise transients

Inferring the Astrophysical Population of Gravitational Wave Sources in the Presence of Noise Transients

Systematic errors in estimation of gravitational-wave candidate significance

The effect of noise artefacts on gravitational-wave searches for neutron star post-merger remnants

Calibrating signal-to-noise ratio detection thresholds using gravitational-wave catalogs

A new method to distinguish gravitational-wave signals from detector noise transients with Gravity Spy

Observational implications of lowering the LIGO-Virgo alert threshold

Antiglitch: a Quasi-physical Model for Removing Short Glitches from LIGO and Virgo Data

Enhancing search pipelines for short gravitational wave transients with Gaussian mixture modelling

Gravitational-Wave Detection using Multivariate Analysis