Abstract:We discuss two proof evaluation activities meant to promote the acquisition of learning behaviors of professional mathematics within an introductory undergraduate proof-writing course. These learning behaviors include the ability to read and discuss mathematics critically, reach a consensus on correctness and clarity as a group, and verbalize what qualities ``good`` proofs possess. The first of these two activities involves peer review and the second focuses on evaluating the quality of internet resources. All of the activities involve groupwork and reflective discussion questions to develop students' experience with these practices of professional mathematics.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### Problems the Paper Aims to Address
The paper "Reflective Groupwork for Introductory Proof-Writing Courses" aims to address the following issues:
1. **Facilitating Students' Mastery of Professional Mathematical Practices**:
- Introductory proof-writing courses are typically designed to prepare students for rigorous proof-based courses such as abstract algebra and real analysis. These courses not only require students to master proof-writing skills but also expect them to understand and practice the norms and behaviors of professional mathematics.
- Professional mathematical practices include critically reading and discussing mathematics, reaching consensus in groups, and describing what constitutes a "good" proof.
2. **Enhancing Students' Collaboration and Reflective Abilities**:
- Through group activities and reflective discussions, help students better understand and apply mathematical concepts.
- Foster collaborative relationships among students, enhancing their motivation and engagement in the course.
3. **Improving Teaching Methods**:
- Traditional mathematics teaching often focuses on the transmission of knowledge while neglecting students' participation in a cultural context. The paper proposes that through group collaboration and reflective activities, students can learn mathematics in practice, thereby better understanding mathematical concepts and proof methods.
### Specific Activities
1. **Peer Review Activity**:
- Students are asked to prove or disprove a proposition (e.g., if \( x \) is a prime number, then \( \sqrt{x} \) is irrational).
- Students exchange proofs in groups, conduct peer reviews, and check the correctness and clarity of the proofs.
- The group discusses and rewrites a member's proof, reflecting on what makes a "good" proof.
2. **Online Resource Evaluation Activity**:
- Students read a proof about the division algorithm and outline the main steps.
- Students find other proofs online and evaluate why these proofs are easier to understand.
- Through group discussions, students identify the strengths and weaknesses of different proofs.
### Goals
- **Cultivate Critical Thinking**: Students learn to critically read and discuss mathematical proofs.
- **Improve Collaboration Skills**: Through group collaboration, students learn to reach consensus within a team.
- **Enhance Reflective Abilities**: Through reflective discussions, students understand what constitutes a "good" proof, thereby improving their own proof-writing skills.
### Conclusion
These activities aim to help students better understand and apply professional mathematical practices through group collaboration and reflective discussions, thereby laying a solid foundation for future advanced mathematics courses.