Thermoelectric transport properties of electron doped pyrite FeS2

Anustup Mukherjee,Alaska Subedi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.4c00147
2023-11-10
Abstract:Pyrite FeS$_2$ has been investigated for a wide range of applications, including thermoelectrics due to previous observation of large thermopower at room-temperature. However, the values of thermopower reported in the literature is extremely sensitive to the nature of sample -- whether they are natural or lab grown, bulk crystals or thin films -- and an ambiguity in the magnitude and sign of thermopower of pure FeS$_2$ exists. Variation in the magnitude of room-temperature thermopower has also been observed in Co-doped samples. Therefore, it is of interest to clarify the intrinsic thermopower of this system that could be measured in more pure samples. In this paper, we investigate the thermoelectric properties of Co-doped FeS$_2$ using first principles calculations. We apply three different doping schemes to understand the effect of electron doping in FeS$_2$, namely explicit Co-substitution, jellium doping and electron addition within rigid band approximation (RBA) picture. The calculated thermopower is less than $-50$ $\mu$V/K for all values of Co doping that we studied, suggesting that this system may not be useful in thermoelectric applications. Interestingly, we find that RBA substantially overestimates the magnitude of calculated thermopower compared to the explicit Co-substitution and jellium doping schemes. The overestimation occurs because the changes in the electronic structure due to doping-induced structural modification and charge screening is not taken into account by the rigid shift of the Fermi level within RBA. RBA is frequently used in first principles investigations of the thermopower of doped semiconductors, and Co-substituted FeS$_2$ illustrates a case where it fails.
Materials Science
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the uncertainty regarding the thermoelectric properties of pyrite FeS₂. Specifically: 1. **Inconsistency of thermopower (Seebeck coefficient S)**: There are large differences in the reported values of the thermopower of pure FeS₂ at room temperature in the literature, and these values are very sensitive to the properties of the samples (such as natural or laboratory - grown, bulk crystal or thin film). Therefore, it is necessary to clarify the inherent thermopower of this material, especially the values measured in purer samples. 2. **Effect of doping on thermoelectric properties**: Researchers also hope to optimize the thermoelectric properties of FeS₂ by doping with cobalt (Co). The paper mentions that the thermopower values of Co - doped FeS₂ at room temperature also have a large range of variation. Therefore, it is necessary to explore the effects of different doping schemes (such as explicit Co substitution, jellium doping and rigid - band approximation (RBA)) on the thermoelectric properties of FeS₂ and evaluate the effectiveness of these methods. ### Main research contents: - **Calculation method**: Use first - principles calculations, calculate the thermoelectric properties through the linearized Boltzmann transport equation (BTE) and the constant relaxation time approximation (CRTA). - **Doping schemes**: Three different electron - doping schemes were studied: explicit Co substitution, jellium doping and rigid - band approximation (RBA). - **Result analysis**: The trends of the thermopower (Seebeck coefficient S) of FeS₂ with temperature under different doping schemes were compared, and the influence of the change of the electronic structure on the thermoelectric properties was analyzed. ### Main conclusions: - **RBA overestimation**: The RBA method significantly overestimates the thermopower of FeS₂, especially at room temperature. This is because RBA does not consider the structural modification and charge - screening effects caused by doping. - **Low thermopower**: Regardless of which doping scheme is adopted, the thermopower values of FeS₂ are relatively low (< 50 µV/K), indicating that electron - doped FeS₂ may not be a good thermoelectric material. Through these studies, the paper aims to provide a theoretical basis for understanding and optimizing the thermoelectric properties of FeS₂.