Abstract:Using the \emph{ab initio} evolutionary algorithm (implemented in USPEX) and electronic structure calculations we investigate the properties of a new thermoelectric material FeSbAs, which is a material analog of the enigmatic thermoelectric FeSb$_{2}$. We utilize the density functional theory and the Gutzwiller method to check the energetics. We find that FeSbAs can be made thermodynamically stable above $\sim$30 GPa. We investigate the electronic structure and thermoelectric properties of FeSbAs based on the density functional theory and compare with those of FeSb$_{2}$. Above 50 K, FeSbAs has higher Seebeck coefficients than FeSb$_{2}$. Upon doping, the figure of merit becomes larger for FeSbAs than for FeSb$_{2}$. Another material analog FeSbP, was also investigated, and found thermodynamically unstable even at very high pressure. Regarding FeSb$_{2}$ as a member of a family of compounds (FeSb$_{2}$, FeSbAs, and FeSbP) we elucidate what are the chemical handles that control the gaps in this series. We also investigate solubility (As or P for Sb in FeSb$_{2}$) we found As to be more soluble. Finally, we study a two-band model for thermoelectric properties and find that the temperature dependent chemical potential and the presence of the ionized impurities are important to explain the extremum in the Seebeck coefficient exhibited in experiments for FeSb$_{2}$.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to explore the structural analogues of the iron - based thermoelectric material FeSb₂, especially the thermoelectric properties and their stabilities of FeSbAs and FeSbP. Specifically, the research objectives include:
1. **Search for new thermoelectric materials**: Through theoretical calculations and structure prediction methods, explore the structural analogues of FeSb₂, especially FeSbAs and FeSbP, in the hope of discovering new materials with better thermoelectric properties.
2. **Evaluate the stability of materials**: Use density functional theory (DFT) and the Gutzwiller method to evaluate the thermodynamic stabilities of FeSbAs and FeSbP under different pressures.
3. **Analyze the electronic structure and thermoelectric properties**: By calculating the electronic structure and thermoelectric properties, compare the differences among FeSb₂, FeSbAs and FeSbP, especially the Seebeck coefficient and power factor (PF).
4. **Understand the impact of chemical substitution**: Explore the impact of Sb being replaced by As or P on the material's energy gap and thermoelectric properties, as well as the physical mechanisms behind these changes.
5. **Optimize thermoelectric properties**: By adjusting the chemical potential and doping, optimize the thermoelectric properties of FeSbAs so that it exhibits a higher Seebeck coefficient and power factor in the medium - temperature range.
### Specific problem analysis
1. **Material design**:
- **FeSbAs**: The research found that FeSbAs can become thermodynamically stable under high pressure above about 30 GPa. Above 50 K, the Seebeck coefficient of FeSbAs is higher than that of FeSb₂, and through doping, its performance index (ZT value) is also better than that of FeSb₂.
- **FeSbP**: FeSbP is not stable even under high pressure, so it is not considered as a potential thermoelectric material.
2. **Electronic structure**:
- The band gaps of FeSb₂, FeSbAs and FeSbP were calculated using the mBJ method. The band gap of FeSbAs is 146 meV, much larger than 19 meV of FeSb₂, while FeSbP exhibits a compensated half - metal.
- By rotating the angle of the Fe octahedron, the size of the band gap can be controlled. The equilibrium rotation angles of FeSb₂, FeSbAs and FeSbP are 15.2°, 18.2° and 19.1° respectively.
3. **Thermoelectric properties**:
- The thermoelectric power (S) and power factor (PF) of FeSb₂, FeSbAs and FeSbP were calculated. Above 50 K, the Seebeck coefficient of FeSbAs is significantly higher than that of FeSb₂, especially in the xx and yy directions.
- Although the Seebeck coefficient of FeSbAs is high, due to its large band gap resulting in low electrical conductivity, its PF/τ value is lower than that of FeSb₂. However, by appropriately doping to adjust the chemical potential, the PF/τ value of FeSbAs can be significantly increased.
- Since FeSbP is in the metallic phase, its PF/τ value is high, but its ZT value is low because of its large electronic thermal conductivity.
### Conclusion
This research has successfully explored the structural analogues FeSbAs and FeSbP of FeSb₂ through theoretical calculations and structure prediction. FeSbAs exhibits good thermoelectric properties under high pressure, especially in the medium - temperature range, where its Seebeck coefficient and power factor are both better than those of FeSb₂. This provides an important theoretical basis and experimental guidance for the design of new - type high - efficiency thermoelectric materials.