Influence of occlusal thickness on the fracture resistance of chairside milled lithium disilicate posterior full‐coverage single‐unit prostheses containing virgilite: A comparative in vitro study
Carlos A. Jurado,Christian Edgar Davila,Alexandra Davila,Alfredo I. Hernandez,Yukari Odagiri,Kelvin I. Afrashtehfar,Damian Lee
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13870
2024-05-26
Journal of Prosthodontics
Abstract:Purpose To evaluate the fracture resistance of chairside computer‐aided design and computer‐aided manufacturing (CAD‐CAM) lithium disilicate mandibular posterior crowns with virgilite of different occlusal thicknesses and compare them to traditional lithium disilicate crowns. Materials and Methods Seventy‐five chairside CAD‐CAM crowns were fabricated for mandibular right first molars, 60 from novel lithium disilicate with virgilite (CEREC Tessera, Dentsply Sirona), and 15 from traditional lithium disilicate (e.max CAD, Ivoclar Vivadent). These crowns were distributed across five groups based on occlusal thickness and material: Group 1 featured CEREC Tessera crowns with 0.8 mm thickness, Group 2 had 1.0 mm thickness, Group 3 had 1.2 mm thickness, Group 4 with 1.5 mm thickness, and Group 5 included e.max CAD crowns with 1.0 mm thickness. These crowns were luted onto 3D‐printed resin dies using Multilink Automix resin cement (Ivoclar Vivadent). Subsequently, they underwent cyclic loading (2,000,000 cycles at 1 Hz with a 275 N force) and loading until fracture. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) assessed the fractured specimens. Statistical analysis involved one‐way ANOVA and the Kruskal‐Wallis Test (α = 0.05). Results Fracture resistance varied significantly (<0.001) across mandibular molar crowns fabricated from chairside CAD‐CAM lithium disilicate containing virgilite, particularly between crowns with 0.8 mm and those with 1.2 and 1.5 mm occlusal thickness. However, no significant differences were found when comparing crowns with 1, 1.2, and 1.5 mm thicknesses. CEREC Tessera crowns with 1.5 mm thickness exhibited the highest resistance (2119 N/mm2), followed by those with 1.2 mm (1982 N/mm2), 1.0 mm (1763 N/mm2), and 0.8 mm (1144 N/mm2) thickness, whereas e.max CAD crowns with 1.0 mm occlusal thickness displayed the lowest resistance (814 N/mm2). Conclusions The relationship between thickness and fracture resistance in the virgilite lithium disilicate full‐coverage crowns was directly proportional, indicating that increased thickness corresponded to higher fracture resistance. No significant differences were noted among crowns with thicknesses ranging from 1 to 1.5 mm. This novel ceramic exhibited superior fracture resistance compared to traditional lithium disilicate.
dentistry, oral surgery & medicine