Approaches to developing tolerance and error budget for active three mirror anastigmat space telescopes

Heejoo Choi,Young-Sik Kim,Hyukmo Kang,Solvay Blomquist,Hill Tailor,Douglas Kelly,Mike Eiklenborg,Ewan S. Douglas,Daewook Kim

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2677986

2023-10-19

Abstract:The size of the optics used in observatories is often limited by fabrication, metrology, and handling technology, but having a large primary mirror provides significant benefits for scientific research. The evolution of rocket launch options enables heavy payload carrying on orbit and outstretching the telescope's form-factor choices. Moreover, cost per launch is lower than the traditional flight method, which is obviously advantageous for various novel space observatory concepts. The University of Arizona has successfully fabricated many large-scale primary optics for ground-based observatories including the Large Binocular Telescope (LBT, 8.4 meter diameter two primary mirrors), Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (now renamed to Vera C. Rubin Observatory, 8.4 meter diameter monolithic primary and tertiary mirror), and the Giant Magellan Telescope (GMT, 8.4 meter diameter primary mirror seven segments). Launching a monolithic primary mirror into space could bypass many of the difficulties encountered during the assembly and deployment of the segmented primary mirrors. However, it might bring up unprecedented challenges and hurdles, also. We explore and foresee the expected challenges and evaluate them. To estimate the tolerance and optical error budget of a large optical system in space such as three mirror anastigmat telescope, we have developed a methodology that considers various errors from design, fabrication, assembly, and environmental factors.

Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper aims to solve the problems of tolerance and error budget for large monolithic primary - mirror space telescopes under the influence of design, manufacturing, assembly and environmental factors. Specifically, the paper focuses on how to establish a comprehensive tolerance model and error allocation scheme for a Three - Mirror Anastigmat (TMA) space telescope with large - field - of - view observation capabilities.

### Main problems

1. **Challenges faced by space telescopes with large monolithic primary mirrors**:
- Although large monolithic primary mirrors can avoid many difficulties encountered by segmented primary mirrors during assembly and deployment, they also bring unprecedented challenges.
- These challenges include various error sources in manufacturing, installation, transportation and on - orbit operation, such as alignment errors, optical surface irregularities, thermal drift, etc.

2. **Establishment of tolerance and error budget**:
- In order to ensure that the final optical performance of the telescope reaches the diffraction limit, detailed analysis and quantification of each error source must be carried out.
- The paper proposes a method that takes into account various errors introduced by design, manufacturing, assembly and environmental factors and allocates them to the optical error budget table.

3. **Classification and evaluation of error sources**:
- **Alignment errors**: These include relative alignment errors between mirrors, which may be caused by factors such as installation, gravity relaxation and thermal drift.
- **Optical surface irregularities**: Caused by factors such as manufacturing, testing, support point control, gravity relaxation and thermal gradient.
- **Wavefront measurement errors**: Involve issues such as measurement accuracy and time delay.

4. **Systematic management of error budget**:
- Error sources are divided into five main categories: alignment, optical surface manufacturing, on - orbit performance of optical surfaces, wavefront measurement and optical design.
- Through multi - level evaluation (Level - 1, Level - 2, Level - 3), specific error values are allocated to each category, and it is ensured that the total error remains within the predetermined range.

### Conclusion

By conducting a comprehensive tolerance analysis on an exemplary large monolithic primary - mirror space telescope, the paper identifies and quantifies potential errors and effectively allocates them to the optical error budget table. This method ensures that all components work together to achieve the expected optical performance of the telescope. Future work will further evaluate the feasibility of these allocations and verify their effectiveness through end - to - end system models.

Through this systematic error management and tolerance analysis, the research team hopes to provide important guidance and support for the design and manufacturing of future large monolithic primary - mirror space telescopes.