James Q. Feng
Abstract:Zeno's ancient paradox depicts a race between swift Achilles and a slow tortoise with a head start. Zeno argued that Achilles could never overtake the tortoise, as at each step Achilles arrived at the tortoise's former position, the tortoise had already moved ahead. Though Zeno's premise is valid, his conclusion that Achilles can "never" pass the tortoise relies on equating infinite steps with an infinite amount of time. By modeling the sequence of events in terms of a converging geometric series, this paper shows that such an infinite number of events sum up to a finite distance traversed in finite time. The paradox stems from confusion between an infinite number of events, which can happen in a finite time interval, and an infinite amount of time. The fallacy is clarified by recognizing that the infinite number of events can be crammed into a finite time interval. At a given speed difference after a finite amount of time, Achilles will have completed the infinite series of gaps at the "catch-up time" and passed the tortoise. Hence this paradox of Achilles and the tortoise can be resolved by simply adding "before the catch-up time" to the concluding statement of "Achilles would never overtake the tortoise".
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper attempts to solve the "Achilles and the Tortoise" paradox in Zeno's paradoxes. Specifically, the paper aims to clarify and resolve the logical fallacy in Zeno's conclusion that Achilles can never catch up with the tortoise.
### Background Introduction
In the paradox proposed by the ancient Greek philosopher Zeno, it is assumed that Achilles (a fast runner) is in a race with a tortoise, and the tortoise has an initial leading distance. According to Zeno's argument, every time Achilles reaches the tortoise's previous position, the tortoise has already moved forward a certain distance, so Achilles can never catch up with the tortoise.
### Core Problems of the Paper
The paper points out that although Zeno's premise is correct, that is, Achilles does indeed need to keep reaching the tortoise's previous position, his conclusion - that Achilles can never catch up with the tortoise - is based on a wrong assumption: an infinite number of steps means an infinite amount of time. Through mathematical modeling, especially by using the method of geometric series, the paper proves that these infinite steps can actually be completed in a finite amount of time.
### Mathematical Modeling
Let Achilles start from \(x = 0\) and run at a constant speed \(s_A\), while the tortoise starts from \(x = x_0\) and moves forward at a constant speed \(s_T\). When Achilles reaches the tortoise's starting position \(x_0\), the tortoise has already moved to a new position \(x_1\), and so on. According to the properties of geometric series, the expression for Achilles to reach position \(x_n\) at time \(t_n\) is:
\[
t_n=\frac{x_0}{s_A}\left[1 + \frac{s_T}{s_A}+\left(\frac{s_T}{s_A}\right)^2+\cdots+\left(\frac{s_T}{s_A}\right)^n\right]
\]
\[
t_n = \frac{x_0}{s_A}\cdot\frac{1-\left(\frac{s_T}{s_A}\right)^{n + 1}}{1-\frac{s_T}{s_A}}
\]
\[
x_n=x_0\cdot\frac{1-\left(\frac{s_T}{s_A}\right)^{n + 1}}{1-\frac{s_T}{s_A}}
\]
When \(n\rightarrow\infty\), Achilles will finally catch up with the tortoise at time \(t_{\infty}\), and the position \(x_{\infty}\) at this time is:
\[
t_{\infty}=\frac{x_0}{s_A}\cdot\frac{1}{1-\frac{s_T}{s_A}}
\]
\[
x_{\infty}=\frac{x_0}{1-\frac{s_T}{s_A}}
\]
### Conclusion
Through the above mathematical modeling, the paper proves that Achilles can indeed catch up with the tortoise in a finite amount of time. The key lies in understanding that an infinite number of steps can be completed in a finite amount of time, rather than requiring an infinite amount of time as Zeno thought. Therefore, the paper resolves the logical fallacy in Zeno's paradox and clarifies the fact that Achilles will eventually catch up with the tortoise.