Abstract:Path integrals appear to offer natural and intuitively appealing methods for defining quantum-mechanical amplitudes for questions involving spacetime regions. For example, the amplitude for entering a spatial region during a given time interval is typically defined by summing over all paths between given initial and final points but restricting them to pass through the region at any time. We argue that there is, however, under very general conditions, a significant complication in such constructions. This is the fact that the concrete implementation of the restrictions on paths over an interval of time corresponds, in an operator language, to sharp monitoring at every moment of time in the given time interval. Such processes suffer from the quantum Zeno effect – the continual monitoring of a quantum system in a Hilbert subspace prevents its state from leaving that subspace. As a consequence, path integral amplitudes defined in this seemingly obvious way have physically and intuitively unreasonable properties and in particular, no sensible classical limit. In this paper we describe this frequently-occurring but little-appreciated phenomenon in some detail, showing clearly the connection with the quantum Zeno effect. We then show that it may be avoided by implementing the restriction on paths in the path integral in a softer way. The resulting amplitudes then involve a new coarse graining parameter, which may be taken to be a timescale , describing the softening of the restrictions on the paths. We argue that the complications arising from the Zeno effect are then negligible as long as >> 1/E, where E is the energy scale of the incoming state. Our criticisms of path integral constructions largely apply to approaches to quantum theory such as the decoherent histories approach or quantum measure theory, which do not specifically involve measurements. We address some criticisms of our approach by Sokolovksi, concerning the relevance of our results to measurement-based models.

Do Simple Infinitesimal Parts Solve Zeno's Paradox of Measure?

Infinitesimal Gunk

Smooth Infinitesimals in the Metaphysical Foundation of Spacetime Theories

An Analysis of Zeno’s Paradox and Non-measurable Sets Based on Dialectical Infinity

Zeno's boêtheia tôi logôi : Thought problems about problems for thought

Amplitudes for spacetime regions and the quantum Zeno effect: pitfalls of standard path integral constructions

Perturbative Approach for the Dynamics of the Quantum Zeno Subspaces

Approaches to analysis with infinitesimals following Robinson, Nelson, and others

Logic and Metaphysics in Zeno's Paradoxes

On the nature of discrete space-time: The atomic theory of space-time and its effects on Pythagoras's theorem, time versus duration, inertial anomalies of astronomical bodies, and special relativity at the Planck scale

Intrinsic Local Distances: A Mixed Solution to Weyl's Tile Argument

The paradox of infinitesimal granularity: Chaos and the reversibility of time in Newton's theory of gravity

Does the Differential Structure of Space-Time Follow from Physical Principles?

Space-time discretization: the way to the fundamental element without a determined form

Interaction-Free Effects Between Distant Atoms

Second-countable compact Hausdorff spaces as remainders in $\mathbf{ZF}$ and two new notions of infiniteness

Aristotle’s Solution to Zeno’s Arrow Paradox and its Implications

Being Of A Thing - Solution of Pre-Zeno Paradoxes, Interpreting the Genesis in Bible and Foundation to Natural Philosophy and General Science

Some paradoxes of Infinity revisited

Separablilty of metric measure spaces and choice axioms

Generalized Von Neumann Universe and Non-Well-Founded Sets