Abstract:Autonomous navigation becomes complex when it is performed in an environment that lacks road signs and includes a variety of users, including vulnerable pedestrians. This article deals with the perception of collision risk from the viewpoint of a passenger sitting in the driver's seat who has delegated the total control of their vehicle to an autonomous system. The proposed study is based on an experiment that used a fixed-base driving simulator. The study was conducted using a group of 20 volunteer participants. Scenarios were developed to simulate avoidance manoeuvres that involved pedestrians walking at 4.5 kph and an autonomous vehicle that was otherwise driving in a straight line at 30 kph. The main objective was to compare two systems of risk perception: These included subjective risk assessments obtained with an analogue handset provided to the participants and electrodermal activity (EDA) that was measured using skin conductance sensors. The relationship between these two types of measures, which possibly relates to the two systems of risk perception, is not unequivocally described in the literature. This experiment addresses this relationship by manipulating two factors: The time-to-collision (TTC) at the initiation of a pedestrian avoidance manoeuvre and the lateral offset left between a vehicle and a pedestrian. These manipulations of vehicle dynamics made it possible to simulate different safety margins regarding pedestrians during avoidance manoeuvres. The conditional dependencies between the two systems and the manipulated factors were studied using hybrid Bayesian networks. This relationship was inferred by selecting the best Bayesian network structure based on the Bayesian information criterion. The results demonstrate that the reduction of safety margins increases risk perception according to both types of indicators. However, the increase in subjective risk is more pronounced than the physiological response. While the indicators cannot be considered redundant, data modeling suggests that the two risk perception systems are not independent.

Zeno at the Steering Wheel

Zeno's boêtheia tôi logôi : Thought problems about problems for thought

The Quantum Zeno Effect -- Watched Pots in the Quantum World

Quantifying perceived risk in driving: A Monte Carlo approach for obstacle avoidance

Podar: Modeling Driver's Perceived Risk with Situation Awareness Theory

Perspectives on the quantum Zeno paradox

The risk ethics of autonomous vehicles: a continuous trolley problem in regular road traffic

Quantifying the Individual Differences of Driver' Risk Perception with Just Four Interpretable Parameters

Autonomous vehicles and moral judgments under risk

A Counterfactual Safety Margin Perspective on the Scoring of Autonomous Vehicles' Riskiness

Strategic Mitigation of Agent Inattention in Drivers with Open-Quantum Cognition Models

Risk Measurement, Risk Entropy, and Autonomous Driving Risk Modeling

The dynamical quantum Zeno effect in quantum decision theory

Away from Trolley Problems and Toward Risk Management

Risk-taking on the road and in the mind: behavioural and neural patterns of decision making between risky and safe drivers

The risk ethics of autonomous vehicles: an empirical approach

Risk Assessment by a Passenger of an Autonomous Vehicle Among Pedestrians: Relationship Between Subjective and Physiological Measures

Risk Illusions in Car Following: is A Smaller Headway Always Perceived As More Dangerous?

Differed Risk Perception in Manual and Automated Driving: an Empirical Study of Varied Conditions

In the driver's mind: modeling the dynamics of human overtaking decisions in interactions with oncoming automated vehicles

Index of braking behaviour in two dimensions within risk perception