Abstract:The arms race between attacks and defenses for machine learning models has come to a forefront in recent years, in both the security community and the privacy community. However, one big limitation of previous research is that the security domain and the privacy domain have typically been considered separately. It is thus unclear whether the defense methods in one domain will have any unexpected impact on the other domain. In this paper, we take a step towards resolving this limitation by combining the two domains. In particular, we measure the success of membership inference attacks against six state-of-the-art defense methods that mitigate the risk of adversarial examples (i.e., evasion attacks). Membership inference attacks determine whether or not an individual data record has been part of a model's training set. The accuracy of such attacks reflects the information leakage of training algorithms about individual members of the training set. Adversarial defense methods against adversarial examples influence the model's decision boundaries such that model predictions remain unchanged for a small area around each input. However, this objective is optimized on training data. Thus, individual data records in the training set have a significant influence on robust models. This makes the models more vulnerable to inference attacks. To perform the membership inference attacks, we leverage the existing inference methods that exploit model predictions. We also propose two new inference methods that exploit structural properties of robust models on adversarially perturbed data. Our experimental evaluation demonstrates that compared with the natural training (undefended) approach, adversarial defense methods can indeed increase the target model's risk against membership inference attacks. When using adversarial defenses to train the robust models, the membership inference advantage increases by up to 4.5 times compared to the naturally undefended models. Beyond revealing the privacy risks of adversarial defenses, we further investigate the factors, such as model capacity, that influence the membership information leakage.

Gotcha! This Model Uses My Code! Evaluating Membership Leakage Risks in Code Models

A Method to Facilitate Membership Inference Attacks in Deep Learning Models

Does Your Neural Code Completion Model Use My Code? A Membership Inference Approach

Privacy Risks of Securing Machine Learning Models against Adversarial Examples

Unawareness detection: Discovering black-box malicious models and quantifying privacy leakage risks

GAN-Leaks: A Taxonomy of Membership Inference Attacks against Generative Models

Stealthy Backdoor Attack for Code Models

Privacy Backdoors: Enhancing Membership Inference through Poisoning Pre-trained Models

A Disguised Wolf Is More Harmful Than a Toothless Tiger: Adaptive Malicious Code Injection Backdoor Attack Leveraging User Behavior as Triggers

Gradient-Leaks: Enabling Black-Box Membership Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning Models

Systematic Evaluation of Privacy Risks of Machine Learning Models

SoK: Reducing the Vulnerability of Fine-tuned Language Models to Membership Inference Attacks

Improved Membership Inference Attacks Against Language Classification Models

Adversarial Attacks on Code Models with Discriminative Graph Patterns

Is Your AI-Generated Code Really Safe? Evaluating Large Language Models on Secure Code Generation with CodeSecEval

Label-Only Membership Inference Attack Based on Model Explanation

Leveraging Adversarial Examples to Quantify Membership Information Leakage

Modelling and Quantifying Membership Information Leakage in Machine Learning

Membership Inference via Backdooring

Machine Learning with Membership Privacy using Adversarial Regularization