Abstract:The arms race between attacks and defenses for machine learning models has come to a forefront in recent years, in both the security community and the privacy community. However, one big limitation of previous research is that the security domain and the privacy domain have typically been considered separately. It is thus unclear whether the defense methods in one domain will have any unexpected impact on the other domain. In this paper, we take a step towards resolving this limitation by combining the two domains. In particular, we measure the success of membership inference attacks against six state-of-the-art defense methods that mitigate the risk of adversarial examples (i.e., evasion attacks). Membership inference attacks determine whether or not an individual data record has been part of a model's training set. The accuracy of such attacks reflects the information leakage of training algorithms about individual members of the training set. Adversarial defense methods against adversarial examples influence the model's decision boundaries such that model predictions remain unchanged for a small area around each input. However, this objective is optimized on training data. Thus, individual data records in the training set have a significant influence on robust models. This makes the models more vulnerable to inference attacks. To perform the membership inference attacks, we leverage the existing inference methods that exploit model predictions. We also propose two new inference methods that exploit structural properties of robust models on adversarially perturbed data. Our experimental evaluation demonstrates that compared with the natural training (undefended) approach, adversarial defense methods can indeed increase the target model's risk against membership inference attacks. When using adversarial defenses to train the robust models, the membership inference advantage increases by up to 4.5 times compared to the naturally undefended models. Beyond revealing the privacy risks of adversarial defenses, we further investigate the factors, such as model capacity, that influence the membership information leakage.

Gradient-Leaks: Enabling Black-Box Membership Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning Models

The Secret Revealer: Generative Model-Inversion Attacks Against Deep Neural Networks

A Method to Facilitate Membership Inference Attacks in Deep Learning Models

l-Leaks: Membership Inference Attacks with Logits

Privacy Analysis of Deep Learning in the Wild: Membership Inference Attacks against Transfer Learning

GAN-Leaks: A Taxonomy of Membership Inference Attacks against Generative Models

Theory-Oriented Deep Leakage from Gradients Via Linear Equation Solver.

FP 2 -MIA: A Membership Inference Attack Free of Posterior Probability in Machine Unlearning.

Gradient leakage attacks in federated learning

Gradient Leakage Defense with Key-Lock Module for Federated Learning

Membership Inference via Backdooring

Privacy Risks of Securing Machine Learning Models against Adversarial Examples

Chameleon: Increasing Label-Only Membership Leakage with Adaptive Poisoning

Membership Inference Attacks on Machine Learning: A Survey

Membership reconstruction attack in deep neural networks

Machine Learning with Membership Privacy using Adversarial Regularization

Analyzing Inference Privacy Risks Through Gradients in Machine Learning

Black-box Membership Inference Attacks against Fine-tuned Diffusion Models

Stealing Machine Learning Models via Prediction APIs

Defenses to Membership Inference Attacks: A Survey