Abstract:With the emergence of Low-Cost Sensor (LCS) devices, measuring real-time data on a large scale has become a feasible alternative approach to more costly devices. Over the years, sensor technologies have evolved which has provided the opportunity to have diversity in LCS selection for the same task. However, this diversity in sensor types adds complexity to appropriate sensor selection for monitoring tasks. In addition, LCS devices are often associated with low confidence in terms of sensing accuracy because of the complexities in sensing principles and the interpretation of monitored data. From the data analytics point of view, data quality is a major concern as low-quality data more often leads to low confidence in the monitoring systems. Therefore, any applications on building monitoring systems using LCS devices need to focus on two main techniques: sensor selection and calibration to improve data quality. In this paper, data-driven techniques were presented for sensor calibration techniques. To validate our methodology and techniques, an air quality monitoring case study from the Bradford district, UK, as part of two European Union (EU) funded projects was used. For this case study, the candidate sensors were selected based on the literature and market availability. The candidate sensors were narrowed down into the selected sensors after analysing their consistency. To address data quality issues, four different calibration methods were compared to derive the best-suited calibration method for the LCS devices in our use case system. In the calibration, meteorological parameters temperature and humidity were used in addition to the observed readings. Moreover, we uniquely considered Absolute Humidity (AH) and Relative Humidity (RH) as part of the calibration process. To validate the result of experimentation, the Coefficient of Determination (R2), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), and Mean Absolute Error (MAE) were compared for both AH and RH. The experimental results showed that calibration with AH has better performance as compared with RH. The experimental results showed the selection and calibration techniques that can be used in designing similar LCS based monitoring systems.

EEATC: A Novel Calibration Approach for Low-cost Sensors

Calibrating Low-Cost Sensors by a Two-Phase Learning Approach for Urban Air Quality Measurement

Data-Driven Techniques for Low-Cost Sensor Selection and Calibration for the Use Case of Air Quality Monitoring

Multihop Calibration for Mobile Sensing: K-hop Calibratability and Reference Sensor Deployment

Intelligent Calibration and Virtual Sensing for Integrated Low-Cost Air Quality Sensors

Dynamic Measurement and Data Calibration for Aerial Mobile IoT

Calibrating networks of low-cost air quality sensors

Learning Calibration Functions on the Fly: Hybrid Batch Online Stacking Ensembles for the Calibration of Low-Cost Air Quality Sensor Networks in the Presence of Concept Drift

Field Reconstruction-Based Non-Rendezvous Calibration for Low Cost Mobile Sensors

Leveraging machine learning algorithms to advance low-cost air sensor calibration in stationary and mobile settings

Calibration and Inter-Unit Consistency Assessment of an Electrochemical Sensor System Using Machine Learning

RCH: Robust Calibration Based on Historical Data for Low-Cost Air Quality Sensor Deployments

Field calibration and analysis of a low-cost sensor network based on the existing air quality infrastructure of a city

Intelligent Air Pollution Sensors Calibration for Extreme Events and Drifts Monitoring

Adaptive Air Quality Sensing using Machine Learning

Poster Abstract: Robust Calibration for Low-Cost Air Quality Sensors Using Historical Data

Low-Cost Outdoor Air Quality Monitoring and Sensor Calibration: A Survey and Critical Analysis

Evaluation of Low-Cost Air Quality Sensor Calibration Models

Multi-Task Learning Based Blind Calibration for Low-Cost Air Quality Sensor Deployments.

Collaborative Calibration and Sensor Placement for Mobile Sensor Networks

Calibrate without Calibrating: An Iterative Approach in Participatory Sensing Network