Abstract:The Ecological Footprint (EF) is a method for estimating the biologically productive area necessary to support current consumption patterns, given prevailing technical and economic processes. By comparing human impact with the planet's limited bioproductive area. this method tests a basic ecological condition for sustainability. The ecological footprint has gained popularity for its pedagogical strength as it expresses the results of its analysis in spatial units that can easily be communicated. Many EF estimates have been performed on a global, national and sulrnationallevel. In this paper. we review the method and critically assess it from a sustainability perspective based on first order principles. We examine: • Which aspects of sustainability are already covered by existing EF assessments; • Which further aspects ofsustainability could be made accountable through the EF (such as areas needed to assimilate waste streams that are not yet accounted for in present assessments); and • Those aspects ofsustainability that cannot be accountable through the EF. Thereby needing complimentary auditing tools. Which aspects of sustainability are already covered by existing EF assessments; Which further aspects ofsustainability could be made accountable through the EF (such as areas needed to assimilate waste streams that are not yet accounted for in present assessments); and Those aspects ofsustainability that cannot be accountable through the EF. Thereby needing complimentary auditing tools. Since the EF is a measure of renewable biocapacity, we argue that some dimensions of ecological sustainability should not be included in the EF. These include human activities that should be phased out to obtain sustainability, such as emissions of persistent compounds foreign to nature and qualitative aspects that represent secondary uses of ecological areas and do not, therefore, occupy a clearly identifiable additional ecological space. We also conclude that the EF is useful for documenting the overall human use or abuse of the potentially renewable functions and services of nature. Particularly, by aggregating in a consistentway a varity of human impacts, it can effectively identify the scale of the human economy by companson with the size of the biosphere.

Footprinting in a course on energy

Investigating the Inventory and Characterization Aspects of Footprinting Methods: Lessons for the Classification and Integration of Footprints

Theoretical exploration for the combination of the ecological, energy, carbon, and water footprints: Overview of a footprint family

Where Has Carbon Footprint Research Gone?

Footprint tools tiptoeing towards nitrogen sustainability

Environmental Footprints: Assessing Anthropogenic Effects on the Planet's Environment

Environmental Footprint Family To Address Local To Planetary Sustainability And Deliver On The Sdgs

Carbon footprint: current methods of estimation

The Footprint Family: Comparison and Interaction of the Ecological, Energy, Carbon and Water Footprints

The ecological footprint from a systems perspective of sustainability

Ecological footprinting: its potential as a tool for change in preservice teacher education

From Emissions to Environmental Impact: Understanding the Carbon Footprint

A User Study of Perceived Carbon Footprint

Footprints in Action: How UVA Is Managing Its Sustainability Stewardship

Know your footprint -- Evaluation of the professional carbon footprint for individual researchers in high energy physics and related fields

The role of climate change education on individual lifetime carbon emissions

Rethinking the Relationship Between Footprints and LCA

Limitations of Carbon Footprint as Indicator of Environmental Sustainability

Carbon footprint of higher education institutions

INPUT–OUTPUT ANALYSIS AND CARBON FOOTPRINTING: AN OVERVIEW OF APPLICATIONS