Abstract:Abstract Purpose The methods for assessing the impact of using abiotic resources in life cycle assessment (LCA) have always been heavily debated. One of the main reasons for this is the lack of a common understanding of the problem related to resource use. This article reports the results of an effort to reach such common understanding between different stakeholder groups and the LCA community. For this, a top-down approach was applied. Methods To guide the process, a four-level top-down framework was used to (1) demarcate the problem that needs to be assessed, (2) translate this into a modeling concept, (3) derive mathematical equations and fill these with data necessary to calculate the characterization factors, and (4) align the system boundaries and assumptions that are made in the life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) model and the life cycle inventory (LCI) model. Results We started from the following definition of the problem of using resources: the decrease of accessibility on a global level of primary and/or secondary elements over the very long term or short term due to the net result of compromising actions. The system model distinguishes accessible and inaccessible stocks in both the environment and the technosphere. Human actions can compromise the accessible stock through environmental dissipation, technosphere hibernation, and occupation in use or through exploration. As a basis for impact assessment , we propose two parameters: the global change in accessible stock as a net result of the compromising actions and the global amount of the accessible stock. We propose three impact categories for the use of elements: environmental dissipation, technosphere hibernation, and occupation in use, with associated characterization equations for two different time horizons. Finally, preliminary characterization factors are derived and applied in a simple illustrative case study for environmental dissipation. Conclusions Due to data constraints, at this moment, only characterization factors for “dissipation to the environment” over a very-long-term time horizon could be elaborated. The case study shows that the calculation of impact scores might be hampered by insufficient LCI data. Most presently available LCI databases are far from complete in registering the flows necessary to assess the impacts on the accessibility of elements. While applying the framework, various choices are made that could plausibly be made differently. We invite our peers to also use this top-down framework when challenging our choices and elaborate that into a consistent set of choices and assumptions when developing LCIA methods.

Rethinking the Relationship Between Footprints and LCA

Where Has Carbon Footprint Research Gone?

Understanding the Complementary Linkages Between Environmental Footprints and Planetary Boundaries in a Footprint–boundary Environmental Sustainability Assessment Framework

Evaluating and Addressing the Leakage Problems of Black Carbon Mitigation in China’s Domestic Sector

Theoretical exploration for the combination of the ecological, energy, carbon, and water footprints: Overview of a footprint family

Environmental Footprints: Assessing Anthropogenic Effects on the Planet's Environment

Investigating the Inventory and Characterization Aspects of Footprinting Methods: Lessons for the Classification and Integration of Footprints

Knowledge Mapping of Carbon Footprint Research in a LCA Perspective: A Visual Analysis Using CiteSpace

Environmental Footprint Family To Address Local To Planetary Sustainability And Deliver On The Sdgs

A Carbon Footprint Analysis of the Redevelopment of Former Residential Areas

Sensitivity of Land Use Change Emission Estimates to Historical Land Use and Land Cover Mapping

Limitations of Carbon Footprint as Indicator of Environmental Sustainability

The Footprint Family: Comparison and Interaction of the Ecological, Energy, Carbon and Water Footprints

Response to Comment on “surface Urban Heat Island Across 419 Global Big Cities”

Unraveling the Relation Between Carbon Emission and Carbon Footprint: A Literature Review and Framework for Sustainable Transportation

Understanding the Complementarities of Environmental Footprints and Planetary Boundaries

A Review of Research on Ecological Footprint

Benchmarking the Carbon, Water, and Land Footprints Against Allocated Planetary Boundaries

Vision 2020: More Needed in Materials Reuse and Recycling to Avoid Land Contamination.

Top-down characterization of resource use in LCA: from problem definition of resource use to operational characterization factors for dissipation of elements to the environment

Pioneering historical LCA - A perspective on the development of personal carbon footprint 1860–2020 in Denmark