Flashpoints Signal Hidden Inherent Instabilities in Land-Use Planning

Hazhir Aliahmadi,Maeve Beckett,Sam Connolly,Dongmei Chen,Greg van Anders

2023-08-15

Abstract:Land-use decision-making processes have a long history of producing globally pervasive systemic equity and sustainability concerns. Quantitative, optimization-based planning approaches, e.g. Multi-Objective Land Allocation (MOLA), seemingly open the possibility to improve objectivity and transparency by explicitly evaluating planning priorities by the type, amount, and location of land uses. Here, we show that optimization-based planning approaches with generic planning criteria generate a series of unstable "flashpoints" whereby tiny changes in planning priorities produce large-scale changes in the amount of land use by type. We give quantitative arguments that the flashpoints we uncover in MOLA models are examples of a more general family of instabilities that occur whenever planning accounts for factors that coordinate use on- and between-sites, regardless of whether these planning factors are formulated explicitly or implicitly. We show that instabilities lead to regions of ambiguity in land-use type that we term "gray areas". By directly mapping gray areas between flashpoints, we show that quantitative methods retain utility by reducing combinatorially large spaces of possible land-use patterns to a small, characteristic set that can engage stakeholders to arrive at more efficient and just outcomes.

Artificial Intelligence,Statistical Mechanics,Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science,Physics and Society

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper discusses a hidden inherent instability problem in land use planning called "Flashpoints". Traditional quantitative optimization planning methods, such as Multi-Objective Land Allocation (MOLA), aim to improve objectivity and transparency by explicitly evaluating different types, quantities, and locations of land use. However, research has found that these methods may generate a series of "Flashpoints" that are extremely sensitive to minor changes in planning priorities. These Flashpoints result in large-scale shifts in land use types.

The paper points out that regardless of whether planning factors are explicitly defined or implicitly present, a more widespread instability family will occur as long as planning considers factors that coordinate the use of different parcels and sites. These instabilities lead to fuzzy land use areas called "Gray Zones," which are highly sensitive to minor changes in planning priorities.

Through the analysis of the MOLA model, researchers found that two common planning criteria, compactness and suitability, generate significant shifts in priorities. They demonstrate that when suitability priorities undergo minor changes, there will be large-scale changes in land use allocation, resulting in a series of unstable "Flashpoints." By comparing the land use patterns between these Flashpoints, gray areas can be identified, and a large number of possible land use patterns can be reduced to a representative set of patterns, facilitating more effective and fair decision-making for stakeholders.

The study also found that the "Flashpoints" in land use are equivalent to the most dramatic state changes in nature, indicating that conventional optimization-supported land use planning methods are not only unclear but also potentially unreliable. Although the MOLA model does not have a globally optimal land use pattern, the priority-pattern relationship provided by the study can help understand planning trade-offs and provide information for sustainable and fair land use decisions.