Abstract:The use of decoy states in quantum key distribution (QKD) has provided a method for substantially increasing the secret key rate and distance that can be covered by QKD protocols with practical signals. The security analysis of these schemes, however, leaves open the possibility that the development of better proof techniques or better classical postprocessing methods might further improve their performance in realistic scenarios. In this paper, we derive upper bounds on the secure key rate for decoy-state QKD. These bounds are based basically only on the classical correlations established by the legitimate users during the quantum communication phase of the protocol. The only assumption about the possible postprocessing methods is that double click events are randomly assigned to single click events. Further, we consider only secure key rates based on the uncalibrated device scenario which assigns imperfections such as detection inefficiency to the eavesdropper. Our analysis relies on two preconditions for secure two-way and one-way QKD. The legitimate users need to prove that there exists no separable state (in the case of two-way QKD) or that there exists no quantum state having a symmetric extension (one-way QKD) that is compatible with the available measurements results. Both criteria have been previously applied to evaluate single-photon implementations of QKD. Here we use them to investigate a realistic source of weak coherent pulses. The resulting upper bounds can be formulated as a convex optimization problem known as a semidefinite program which can be efficiently solved. For the standard four-state QKD protocol, they are quite close to known lower bounds, thus showing that there are clear limits to the further improvement of classical postprocessing techniques in decoy-state QKD.

Finite-key security of passive quantum key distribution

Finite-key security of passive quantum key distribution

A fully passive transmitter for decoy-state quantum key distribution

Experimental demonstration of fully passive quantum key distribution

Proof-of-Principle Demonstration of Fully-Passive Quantum Key Distribution

Fully passive measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution

Tight Security Bounds for Decoy-State Quantum Key Distribution

Fully-Passive Twin-Field Quantum Key Distribution

Upper bounds for the secure key rate of the decoy-state quantum key distribution

Finite-key security analysis for quantum key distribution with leaky sources

Secret key rate bounds for quantum key distribution with non-uniform phase randomization

Simplified BB84 quantum key distribution secure against coherent attacks

A security framework for quantum key distribution implementations

Efficient passive measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution

Twin-field quantum key distribution with passive-decoy state

Finite-key Analysis of Practical Decoy-State Measurement-Device-independent Quantum Key Distribution with Unstable Sources

A passive transmitter for quantum key distribution with coherent light

Finite-key security analysis of quantum key distribution with imperfect light sources

Quantum key distribution with imperfectly isolated devices