Alterations in electroosmotic slip velocity: combined effect of viscoelasticity and surface potential undulation

Bimalendu Mahapatra,Aditya Bandopadhyay
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjs/s11734-022-00756-7
2022-11-19
Abstract:In computational models of microchannel flows, the Helmholtz-Smoluchowski slip velocity boundary condition is often used because it approximates the motion of the electric double layer without resolving the charge density profiles close to the walls while drastically reducing the computational effort needed for the flow model to be solved. Despite working well for straight channel flow of Newtonian fluids, the approximation does not work well for flow involving complex fluids and spatially varying surface potential distribution. To treat these effects using the slip velocity boundary condition, it is necessary to understand how the surface potential and fluid properties affect the slip velocity. The present analysis shows the existence of a modified electroosmotic slip velocity for viscoelastic fluids, which is strongly dependent upon Deborah number and viscosity ratio, and this modification differs significantly from the slip velocity of Newtonian fluids. An augmentation of fluid elasticity results in an asymmetric distribution of slip velocity. Nonintuitively, the modulation wavelength of the imposed surface potential contributes to changing the slip velocity magnitude and adding periodicity to the solution. The proposed electroosmotic slip velocity for viscoelastic fluid can be used in computational models of microchannel flows to approximate the motion of the electric double layer without resolving the charge density profiles close to the walls.
Fluid Dynamics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is how to accurately describe the change of electroosmotic slip velocity when using elastic fluids with modulated surface potential in microchannel electroosmotic flow. Specifically, the paper explores the influence of fluid elasticity and surface potential fluctuation on the electroosmotic slip velocity, especially under the condition of thin electric double layer (EDL). The research focuses on: 1. **Influence of fluid elasticity**: The paper analyzes the flow characteristics of Oldroyd - B type elastic fluids in microchannels, especially how the elastic properties of the fluid (characterized by Deborah number \( \text{De} \) and viscosity ratio \( \beta \)) affect the electroosmotic slip velocity. The research shows that as the fluid elasticity increases (i.e., De increases), the slip velocity distribution becomes asymmetric, and the absolute value of the slip velocity \( |u_s| \) also increases. 2. **Influence of surface potential modulation**: The paper considers the influence of surface potential modulation on the electroosmotic slip velocity. The wavelength \( n \) and amplitude \( m \) of surface potential modulation have a significant impact on the magnitude and periodicity of the slip velocity. It is found that the change of modulation wavelength \( n \) not only changes the magnitude of the slip velocity but also introduces periodicity. 3. **Influence of high - order corrections**: The paper considers the influence of high - order correction terms on the slip velocity by the asymptotic expansion method. These high - order correction terms include \( O(\text{De}) \), \( O(\beta) \), \( O(\text{De}\beta) \) etc. It is found that some high - order correction terms contribute significantly to the slip velocity, while other terms have no obvious influence. ### Main conclusions - **Non - linear change of slip velocity**: As the Deborah number increases, the slip velocity distribution changes from symmetric to asymmetric, and the absolute value of the slip velocity increases. - **Influence of surface potential modulation**: The wavelength \( n \) and amplitude \( m \) of surface potential modulation significantly affect the magnitude and periodicity of the slip velocity. - **Importance of high - order corrections**: High - order correction terms (such as \( O(\text{De}\beta) \)) contribute significantly to the slip velocity, while some low - order terms (such as \( O(\beta) \) and \( O(\beta^2) \)) have no obvious influence. ### Formula summary - **Asymptotic solution of electroosmotic slip velocity**: \[ u_s=\lim_{\tilde{y}\to\infty}\left(\tilde{u}_0 + \text{De}\tilde{u}_{10}+\beta\tilde{u}_{01}+\text{De}\beta\tilde{u}_{11}+\text{De}^2\tilde{u}_{20}+\beta^2\tilde{u}_{02}+\text{De}^2\beta\tilde{u}_{21}+\text{De}\beta^2\tilde{u}_{12}+\text{De}^2\beta^2\tilde{u}_{22}\right) \] - **Main slip velocity correction terms**: - \( O(\text{De}) \) correction: \[ \lim_{\tilde{y}\to\infty}\tilde{u}_{10}=-\frac{3}{2}m\left(m\sin(2n\tilde{x}+2\theta)+2\sin(n\tilde{x}+\theta)\right)n \] - \( O(\text{De}\beta) \) correction: \[ \lim_{\tilde{y}\to\infty}\tilde{u}_{11}=\frac{3}{2}m\left(m\sin(2n\tilde{x}+2\theta)